The definition of a homeomorphism between topological spaces X, Y, is that there exists a function Y=f(X) that is continuous and whose inverse X=f(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); ^{-1}(Y) is also continuous.

Can I assume that the function f is a bijection, since inverses only exist for bijections?

Also, I thought that if a function f is continuous, then its inverse is automatically continuous? So why is there a need to mention that the inverse is also continuous in the definition I have above?

Also, a manifold is defined to be a topological space that is locally homeomorphic to R^n. So take the interval [a,b] on R. Would this be a manifold? [a,b] is compact so is not homeomorphic to R, but locally it can be done with an open covering of [a,b]. If there exists just one open covering where each of the open sets is homeomorphic to R^n, then is that sufficient to say the space is a manifold?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Definition of a homeomorphism between topological spaces

Loading...

Similar Threads - Definition homeomorphism between | Date |
---|---|

I Basic Q about Vector/tensor definition and velocity | Feb 24, 2018 |

I Definition of tangent space: why germs? | Oct 2, 2017 |

I Difference between diffeomorphism and homeomorphism | Aug 18, 2017 |

A Intution behind the definition of extrinsic curvature | Jun 15, 2017 |

A Definition of the Lie derivative | Oct 27, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**