Deflection of a Perfect Strut Under Point Forces

  • Thread starter Thread starter dichotomy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Deflection
AI Thread Summary
A perfect strut compressed by two point forces acting on its centroid would not bend laterally, as these forces do not create a moment or horizontal component necessary for lateral deflection. The discussion emphasizes that if the strut is perfectly aligned and geometrically impeccable, it remains in pure compression without buckling. Factors such as end restraints, moment of inertia, unbraced length, and applied load are crucial in determining the strut's behavior under compression. As the strut's length increases or the load intensifies, the risk of buckling and lateral deflection rises, but under ideal conditions, it should remain stable. The consensus is that without eccentricity or moments, a perfect strut should not experience lateral bending.
dichotomy
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
hello all, first post here so don't bite.

if a perfect strut was compressed by an 2 imaginary point forces acting exactly on its centroid, and ignoring outside effects, would it bend laterally, and why so? when I say perfect, i mean ignore all consequences of practicality, ie. the alignment is precise to the eg. atom, and the bar is of impeccable geometry along its length.

i was having a debate about this for at least 20 minutes with someone, and I saw no good reason why it should (ignoring material failure for the moment), since the point forces acting on the centroid produce no moment/horizontal component to cause the strut to bend in such a dramatic manner.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What? Be more clear. If one of the components of a load is perpendicular to the centroidal axis (beam, bar, slab, etc...), then there would be bending!.
 
Last edited:
In your perfect example, I guess there is no real reason for the column to buckle. You would then have to deal with compressive failure. If there is no moment at the ends or eccentricity to the load and the material is perfectly homogeneous, it should be in perfect compression. I had to take a quick look back in one of my books to make sure the Euler equation for buckling is derived assuming that there is an applied moment at the end of the column.
 
dichotomy said:
hello all, first post here so don't bite.

if a perfect strut was compressed by an 2 imaginary point forces acting exactly on its centroid, and ignoring outside effects, would it bend laterally, and why so? when I say perfect, i mean ignore all consequences of practicality, ie. the alignment is precise to the eg. atom, and the bar is of impeccable geometry along its length.

i was having a debate about this for at least 20 minutes with someone, and I saw no good reason why it should (ignoring material failure for the moment), since the point forces acting on the centroid produce no moment/horizontal component to cause the strut to bend in such a dramatic manner.

You have to know several different things before you can answer that question.

1) end restraints (it is common to assume that both ends are pinned or free to rotate)
2) moment of inertia of the section (about both axes)
3) unbraced length of the strut in compression
4) the amount of load applied

As the strut length gets longer, the section gets smaller, or the applied load gets larger, the strut will be more likely to buckle and deflect laterally. Assuming the section is sized appropriately, it will not buckle and will not deflect lateraly. :biggrin:
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top