I Degeneracy in quantum statistics

arneet
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
degeneracy,this word appears in my textbook many times,but i could not understand what it means in quantum statistics.also in my textbook it is said in bose-einstein statistics that " the deviation from perfect gas behaviour exhibited by bose-einstein gas is called gas degeneracy".but i can't understand it how degeneracy is related to deviation from ideal behaviour of gas.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's the amount of times one particular state is satisfied.

It's actually easier to use the standard quantum physics example, so I'll use that:

Imagine a situation where some amount of energy is described by

##E = k(n_x^2 + n_y^2 + n_z^2)##

where nx, ny, nz are positive integers.

For different values of each n, you can sometimes get the same E value.

For example, for nx=1, ny=1, nz=1 , we have E=3k

Now try some others:

nx=1, ny=1, nz=2 ... E=6k
nx=1, ny=2, nz=1 ... E=6k
nx=2, ny=1, nz=1 ... E=6k

This clearly shows that there are three totally different situations which give the same result for E.

This is the degeneracy. The E=6k level has a degeneracy of 3.

The same can be applied to any statistical system.

The degeneracy of any particular state is essentially the number of different ways that same state can be achieved.

Hope that helps!

EDIT: Just seen you ask about how it relates to Bose-Einstein statistics and 'gas degeneracy'. I'm not sure of that one, to be honest!
 
  • Like
Likes arneet
That's degeneracy of eigenvalues in linear algebra (or quantum mechanics which is applied linear algebra on the separable Hilbert space).

In statistical physics degeneracy refers to the deviations of a many-body system in thermal equilibrium from the classical statistics. The classical statistics holds, if the occupation per state is small compared to 1. If you have large occupation numbers per state, the Fermi-Dirac or Bose-Einstein statistics must be used instead of the Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics of classical statistics.
 
  • Like
Likes arneet
sa1988 said:
It's the amount of times one particular state is satisfied.

It's actually easier to use the standard quantum physics example, so I'll use that:

Imagine a situation where some amount of energy is described by

##E = k(n_x^2 + n_y^2 + n_z^2)##

where nx, ny, nz are positive integers.

For different values of each n, you can sometimes get the same E value.

For example, for nx=1, ny=1, nz=1 , we have E=3k

Now try some others:

nx=1, ny=1, nz=2 ... E=6k
nx=1, ny=2, nz=1 ... E=6k
nx=2, ny=1, nz=1 ... E=6k

This clearly shows that there are three totally different situations which give the same result for E.

This is the degeneracy. The E=6k level has a degeneracy of 3.

The same can be applied to any statistical system.

The degeneracy of any particular state is essentially the number of different ways that same state can be achieved.

Hope that helps!

EDIT: Just seen you ask about how it relates to Bose-Einstein statistics and 'gas degeneracy'. I'm not sure of that one, to be honest!
thank you,it was helpful.
 
vanhees71 said:
That's degeneracy of eigenvalues in linear algebra (or quantum mechanics which is applied linear algebra on the separable Hilbert space).

In statistical physics degeneracy refers to the deviations of a many-body system in thermal equilibrium from the classical statistics. The classical statistics holds, if the occupation per state is small compared to 1. If you have large occupation numbers per state, the Fermi-Dirac or Bose-Einstein statistics must be used instead of the Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics of classical statistics.
sir,it was helpful.thank you.it would be great if you can explain a bit more about degeneracy particularly in statistical physics.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top