Degree of freedom of a block of wood sliding on a horizontal plane

sudipmaity
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find out the degrees of freedom of a block of wood sliding on a horizontal plane.

Homework Equations


DoF=Nn-k
N=no. of dimensions. n=no. of particles.k= no. of constraints.

The Attempt at a Solution


I am considering the block of wood as a rigid body made of n no. of particles.
But it will move with respect to a center of mass.
I will need 3 points on the body to define the CM.
As the body is constrained to move on a plane each of these 3 points can be denoted with 2 coordinate points.
Each of these 3 points has fixed distance from each other so there will be 3 constraints if these points are non collinear.
So i think the answer should be 3×2-3=3.
Are my deductions correct??
[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So you have 2 dimensions. One particle with no constraints would have two degrees of freedom ? Not 4 (x, y, vx, vy) ?

I also don't quite follow how you need 3 points to define the CM. Wouldn't e.g. two corners be enough ? Could you explain ? (It may be correct, I just wonder)
 
Please BvU clarify one thing, should i consider the block of wood a rigid 3d body or a point particle??
 
It's a block of wood. To me that sounds closer to a rigid body than to a point particle.
You said you need three points to pinpoint the block. Why three ?

What is the basis for your relevant equation ? Does a particle on a plane with no further constraints have 2 degrees of freedom in your book ?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top