- #1
- 4,652
- 37
Has anyone else been following this story?
More about it here:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/state/20060221-9999-7n21morales.html
http://www.indybay.org/news/2006/02/1803833.phpFEBRUARY 21, 2006 - Michael Morales was not executed last night because the anesthesiologists that had agreed to participate in the execution walked out after determining that what was being asked of them was "unethical". The state has rescheduled the execution for TODAY, FEBRUARY 21ST AT 7:30PM. The state now plans to proceed with the execution using only sodium thiopental or some combination of barbiturates. This is the first time ever that a state plans to carry out an execution using only barbiturates.
More about it here:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/state/20060221-9999-7n21morales.html
Under a new procedure ordered by a federal judge last week, prison officials retained an anesthesiologist to be in the death chamber to certify that Morales would be unconscious from a sedative before another doctor administered a paralyzing agent and the drug designed to stop Morales' heart.
The change was made after Morales and his attorneys argued that the three-part lethal injection cocktail used in California and 35 other states violated the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. They said a prisoner would feel excruciating pain from the last two chemicals if he were not fully sedated.
The execution, which had been planned for just after midnight, was delayed for at least an hour to give the anesthesiologists additional training, Crittendon said.
Last edited by a moderator: