Deleting exhaust crap off my bike

  • Thread starter Thread starter shippy__
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bike Exhaust
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on modifying a motorcycle by removing the exhaust system components and tricking the ECU into believing they are still present. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the specific exhaust components being removed and the bike's make and model before proceeding. There are warnings about the potential performance and emissions issues that could arise from such modifications, as well as legal implications and warranty concerns. Seeking professional guidance is recommended to ensure the modification is done safely and effectively. Overall, caution and thorough research are advised for anyone considering similar DIY projects.
shippy__
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Long story short I am deleting the exhaust crap off my bike to do so I need to trick my ECU into thinking its still there. I need you guys to help me figure out what I need to do so... Please refer to paint shop drawing

If you could talk me though it or draw me up something It would be much appreciated, you may dumb it down a little as I am a labourer... I just like to DIY What will I need... smaller the better

Untitledddddssss_zpsf15900be.jpg
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
surely its not that hard ?
 
shippy__ said:
Long story short I am deleting the exhaust crap off my bike...

1. Exactly what "exhaust crap" are you removing?
2. What year, make, and model is the bike?
 


I understand the desire to modify and improve your bike. However, I must caution against tampering with the exhaust system without proper knowledge and expertise. It is important to consider the potential consequences of altering the ECU and the impact it may have on the performance and emissions of your bike.

That being said, if you are determined to proceed with this modification, I recommend seeking the assistance of a professional mechanic or automotive engineer who can properly guide you through the process and ensure it is done safely and effectively.

In terms of what you will need, it will depend on the specific make and model of your bike and the modifications you are planning to make. I cannot provide specific instructions without more information. However, I suggest starting with a thorough understanding of the ECU and its functions, as well as the exhaust system and its role in the overall performance of your bike.

In addition, you may need specialized tools and equipment, such as a diagnostic scanner, to properly manipulate the ECU. It is also important to carefully follow any instructions or diagrams provided by the manufacturer or a trained professional.

Please keep in mind that modifications to your bike can have legal implications and may also void any warranties. I urge you to proceed with caution and seek the necessary expertise to ensure the safety and legality of your modifications.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top