Delta-Epsilon Proof for f(x) = 2√(x + 1) at x = 3 with L = 4 and ε = 0.2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Oneiromancy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Oneiromancy
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I'm just kind of confused on how to handle the absolute value along with the inequality. Bad algebra skills. :(

0 < |x - x_0| < \delta \Rightarrow | f (x) - L | < \epsilon

I'm given: f(x) = 2\sqrt{x + 1}, x_{0} = 3, L = 4, \epsilon = 0.2

The attempt at a solution

Nevermind, I tried latex and it messed everything up. Sorry.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, there!

It is best to forget about the epsilon at first, and focus on bounding the difference in terms of delta.

So, we are to bound:
|\sqrt{2x+1}-\sqrt{2x_{0}+1}|=|\frac{2x+1-(2x_{0}+1)}{\sqrt{2x+1}+\sqrt{2x_{0}+1}}|=2\frac{|x-x_{0}|}{|\sqrt{2x+1}+\sqrt{2x_{0}+1}|}&lt;2\frac{\delta}{\sqrt{2x_{0}+1}}

You may use this to determine a delta that surely will work for som particular epsilon, say:
\delta=\frac{\epsilon}{2}\sqrt{2x_{0}+1}

Edit:
Seems I used the wrong function, but the technique is similar for your case. Try it out.
 
Last edited:
Why did you do 2x_0 + 1?
 
Did you see my edit?

Follow a similar procedure with |2*sqrt(x+1)-2*sqrt(x0+1)| instead.

Don't bother to use digit-written numbers(like using 3 instead of x0) before the end.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top