Optimizing Demand Function: Find Units Sold & Price Per Unit | Help Needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter JBauer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
AI Thread Summary
The demand function is defined as x = D(p) = 1450 - 3p^3 for 0 < p < 7.85. When the price per unit is $5.75, the calculated number of units sold is approximately 879.67, which should be rounded down to 879 units. To find the price per unit when 1000 units are sold, the equation 1000 = 1450 - 3p^3 is used, leading to a price of approximately $5.24. The setup for both calculations is confirmed to be correct. Understanding these calculations is essential for optimizing pricing strategies.
JBauer
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
The demand function for a product is given by

x = D(p) = 1450 - 3p^3, 0<p<7.85 (please note these should both be less-than-or-equal-to signs)

(a) Find the number of units sold when the price per unit is $5.75.

D(5.75) = 1450 - 3(5.75)^3 = 879.67

Did I set this up correctly? Can anyone confirm this answer?


(b) Find the price per unit when 1000 units are sold.

How would I set this up?

Thanks!

J.B.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i'm really out of touch with this but


your first one appears right. The number of units has to be an integer which you should round down which will yield 879 units, because you cannot sell a fraction of a product!

As for the second one when 1000 units are sold then the D(p) = 1000 and you have to find the value of p then

1000 = 1450 - 3p^3

and solve for p
 


(a) Yes, you have set it up correctly. The number of units sold when the price per unit is $5.75 is 879.67.

(b) To find the price per unit when 1000 units are sold, we can use the inverse of the demand function. The inverse demand function is given by p = D^-1(x) = (1450 - x/3)^(1/3). So, we can plug in x = 1000 and solve for p.

p = (1450 - 1000/3)^(1/3) = $5.24

Therefore, the price per unit when 1000 units are sold is $5.24.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top