Demonstrating Propagator is Virtual

  • Thread starter Thread starter maximus123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Propagator Virtual
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the four-momentum conservation in the context of virtual particles, specifically focusing on an electron scattering process involving photon exchange. The key equation presented is the relativistic relation E² - p² = m², which is used to derive the mass of the exchanged photon as Δm² = ΔE² - Δp² = - (m² Δp² / E²) < 0, indicating that the photon is virtual. The user seeks clarification on demonstrating that the four-momentum squared is not conserved at the vertex, leading to the conclusion that the propagator represents a virtual particle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic energy-momentum relations
  • Familiarity with four-momentum concepts in particle physics
  • Knowledge of virtual particles and their properties
  • Basic proficiency in quantum field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of four-momentum conservation in particle interactions
  • Learn about virtual particles and their role in quantum field theory
  • Explore the implications of on-shell versus off-shell conditions for particles
  • Investigate the mathematical framework of propagators in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics and particle physics, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of virtual particles and four-momentum conservation.

maximus123
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I've been given a problem which is asking me to flesh out a calculation. The calculation is word for word like this;

consider, for example, an electron of total energy E, momentum p, and mass m being scattered as another electron absorbs the exchanged photon. The relativistic relation between E, p, and m is;

E^2-p^2=m^2​

If the electron emits a photon of energy \Delta E and momentum \Delta p then

E \Delta E-p \Delta p=0​

So that the mass of the exchanged photon is

\Delta m^2=\Delta E^2- \Delta p^2=-\frac{m^2 \Delta p^2}{E^2}&lt;0​

So I am being asked to work this out in detail, fill in all the steps. I thought that maybe I should try and show that the four momentum squared is not conserved at the vertex, i.e that the sum of the four momentum squared of the two electrons could not equal the four momentum squared of the photon and it was that violation that showed the particle was virtual;

q^2=(p_e + p_e)^2

q^2=2p_e^2​

Where q^2 is the four momentum squared of the photon (i.e the mass of the photon) and p_e^2 is the four momentum squared of the electron, hence on one side of the vertex there are two electrons and on the other side there is a photon. The four momentum for the electron is (E, \textbf{p}) so;

q^2=2[E^2-(p_x^2+p_y^2+p_z^2)]

=2(E^2-|\textbf{p}|^2)

q^2=2m^2​

Clearly this is going nowhere near the result result in the problem. Am I on the right track? I know I have probably made a dozen mistakes here as I am new to these sort of calculations. I would greatly appreciate if anyone could explain how to achieve the result above.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, when I say

I thought that maybe I should try and show that the four momentum squared is not conserved at the vertex, i.e that the sum of the four momentum squared of the two electrons could not equal the four momentum squared of the photon and it was that violation that showed the particle was virtual

What I mean is use the fact that four momentum is conserved at the vertex to show that the equation for energy mass and momentum does not apply to the propagator, hence virtual.
 
Something seems strange to me in the original wording. I just did a quick calculation, and found that ##E\Delta E - p\Delta p = 0## only if ##\Delta E^2 - \Delta p^2 = 0##, i.e., if the photon is on-shell.

Are you sure you've got the original wording right, and complete?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K