Density Matrix (pure state) Property

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around proving the property of the density matrix for a pure state, specifically its positive semi-definiteness. Participants explore mathematical approaches to demonstrate this property, including the structure of the density matrix and its implications in quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks help to prove that the expression |a|^2 x |c|^2 + |b|^2 x |d|^2 + ab*c*d + a*bcd* is non-negative, where a, b, c, and d are complex numbers.
  • Another participant notes that the density matrix can be defined for an ensemble of spinors and questions how to prove the property in that context.
  • A participant suggests that the condition |a|^2 + |b|^2 = 1 is likely due to the trace of the density matrix being 1, and discusses the implications of the matrix being Hermitian.
  • One participant elaborates on the properties of the density matrix, mentioning that the determinant is zero, leading to one eigenvalue being zero and the other being one, thus indicating the matrix is semi-positive definite.
  • A later reply provides a detailed algebraic manipulation of the expression to show it is non-negative, concluding that it can be expressed as |ac* + bd*|^2, which is always greater than or equal to zero.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying approaches to proving the property of the density matrix, with some agreeing on the implications of the determinant and eigenvalues, while others focus on different algebraic manipulations. No consensus is reached on a singular method of proof.

Contextual Notes

Participants rely on assumptions about the density matrix's properties, such as its Hermitian nature and the normalization condition of the coefficients. Some mathematical steps remain unresolved or are approached differently by various participants.

Toten
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello.

I need some help to prove the first property of the density matrix for a pure state.
According to this property, the density matrix is definite positive (or semi-definite positive). I've been trying to prove it mathematically, but I can't.

I need to prove that |a|^2 x |c|^2 + |b|^2 x |d|^2 + ab*c*d + a*bcd* >= 0,
where a, b, c, and d are complex numbers, and * means the complex conjugate.

My Density Matrix M (2x2) has the following elements:
m11 = |a|^2, m12 = ab*, m21 = a*b, m22 = |b|^2

And (c; d) is just a ket in the C2 space.

I hope you can help me. Thanks you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Even if the density matrix is defined for a ensemble of spinors, the property holds true. How can you prove it?
 
Probably you have that [itex]|a|^2+|b|^2=1[/itex], because trace should be 1.

You matrix is Hermitian. Trace is the sum of eigenvalues, determinant is the product of eigenvalues. The determinant of your matrix is zero. Therefore one of the eigenvalues is zero, the other must be 1. Therefore your matrix is semi-positive definite.
 
arkajad said:
Probably you have that [itex]|a|^2+|b|^2=1[/itex], because trace should be 1.

You matrix is Hermitian. Trace is the sum of eigenvalues, determinant is the product of eigenvalues. The determinant of your matrix is zero. Therefore one of the eigenvalues is zero, the other must be 1. Therefore your matrix is semi-positive definite.

Thank you! I hadn't realize that the determinant of the density matrix is zero. This gave me an idea on how to reorganize the terms in the following expression:

|a|^2 x |c|^2 + |b|^2 x |d|^2 + ab*c*d + a*bcd*
= aa*cc* + bb*dd* + ab*c*d + a*bcd*
= ac*a*c + bd*b*d + ac*b*d + bd*a*c
= ac*(a*c + b*d) + bd*(b*d + a*c)
= ac*(a*c + b*d) + bd*(a*c + b*d)
= (ac* + bd*)(a*c + b*d)
= (ac* + bd*)(ac* + bd*)*
= |ac* + bd*|^2, which is always greater than or equal to zero.

I don't know if this is the easiest way to prove it, but it is definitely one way.

Thanks for your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K