Depreciating Printer Value: Algebra 2 Midterm Question Answered

  • Thread starter Thread starter marmot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modeling
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a math problem involving the depreciation of a printer valued at $35,000, which depreciates at a rate of 5% per year. The initial approach used a differential equation to model the depreciation, but the solution was found to be incorrect. The correct formula for continuous depreciation was identified as P=exp(-0.051293t)Po, leading to confusion about the relationship between the rate of change and the depreciation rate. The conversation highlights the difference between continuously compounded interest and annually compounded interest, which clarifies the discrepancy in understanding the depreciation model. Overall, the thread emphasizes the complexities of modeling depreciation mathematically.
marmot
Messages
55
Reaction score
1
o my bro ahd an algebra 2 midterm and a question was this:

) A printer costs $35,000 (how old are these questions lol) but it depreciates 5% a year. What is the value by the 4th year?

ok so being an overtly complex person i tried to model a differential equation of this just for the kicks.

At first I thought

dP/dt=-0.05P

where P is price

and the solution is Po*exp(-0.5t) where Po=35000

however this is wrong. So I assumed I did not know r from dP/dt=-rP and worked the problem by finding the initial values.

so the solution gives me P=exp(-.051293t)Po which is correct.

I don't grasp intuitively the answer. why is dP/dt=.051293P when the problem says it goes down 0.5 each year so I assume P changes over time by -0.05P per year?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
marmot said:
I don't grasp intuitively the answer. why is dP/dt=.051293P when the problem says it goes down 0.5 each year so I assume P changes over time by -0.05P per year?

P does change by 0.5 per year. Look up continuously compounded interest vs annually compounded interest.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compound_interest
 
Last edited:
That's weird. Where did my posts go? I swear I answered this question already...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top