Derating PFC Capacitors for 50Hz Wind Turbine Conversion | Expert Tips

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hektor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitors
AI Thread Summary
When converting a fixed speed wind turbine from 60Hz to 50Hz, derating passive PFC capacitor banks involves understanding the changes in inductive and capacitive reactive power. The general consensus is that the capacitors may need to be upsized rather than downsized, as lower frequency results in decreased inductive reactance, requiring more capacitive reactive power for compensation. Operating at 50Hz may expose the capacitors to less energy, implying that for equivalent filtering, more capacitance is needed compared to 60Hz. While the capacitors can handle 50Hz operation, the downstream DC output may experience slightly less filtering. Overall, careful consideration of these factors is essential for optimal performance in the conversion process.
Hektor
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm converting a first generation, fixed speed wind turbine from 60Hz operation to 50Hz operation. There are passive PFC capacitor banks in the downtower box on the turbine. How are the capacitor banks derated for 50 Hz operation? Is it as simple as, for example, downsizing from 15 to 12.5 kVAR (17%)? Thanks for any help!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think you are actually upsizing...due to the impedance of 1/JωC
So more like 17.5 KVAR. They should be able to handle more inductive reactive power...although now it may be too much in a capacitive way.

But I'm pretty sure that is wrong. Just some random thoughts.

Dice it.
 
I was thinking that because xL = jwL, inductive reactance would go down as frequency decreases. And as current will be staying the same, there will be less inductive reactive power (VAR). Then, I figured I would need less capacitive reactive power to compensate.
 
Perhaps both are correct. They are both a logical conclusion.

Or not...someone else will speak up soon...
 
Think of it this way. What is the easiest life for a capacitor? It would be having only pure DC at its inputs. 60 changes a second is more work than 50 changes a second. If you look at how much energy the device is exposed to , that would also be less. That would imply for the same level of filtering at 60 Hz you would need a bit more capacitance than at 50 Hz as the number of positive pulses per unit of time, assuming a full wave rectified output fed to the capacitor, would be less.

In a nutshell, you will not be hurting the capacitors by feeding them 50 Hz but your downstream DC will be slightly less filtered.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Replies
72
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
7K
Replies
27
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top