I'm afraid I'm suffering from a bit of brain block in try to get from the simple statement of change in the number of daughter nuclei arising from the decay of parent nuclei. The basic statement is straight forward...(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]

\frac {dN_d}{dt} = \lambda_pN_p - \lambda_dN_d

[/tex]

Subscripts d and p denote parent and daughter nuclei and lambda is the activity.

However I'm struggling to derive the following relationship from the above identity - I can't seem to find any pointers in any text books... At face value I think this should be a pretty easy first order ODE to solve, but I think I'm probably missing something blindingly obvious, but any tips would be gratefully recieved.

[tex]

N_d = \frac{\lambda_pN_{p0}}{\lambda_d - \lambda_p} (e^{-\lambda_pt}-e^{\lambda_dt}) + N_{d0}e^{\lambda_dt}

[/tex]

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Derivation of Decay Chain Formulae

Loading...

Similar Threads - Derivation Decay Chain | Date |
---|---|

A Angular momentum operator derived from Lorentz invariance | Feb 17, 2018 |

I Why does the long-lived kaon only rarely decay to two pions? | Feb 11, 2018 |

A Covariant derivative in Standard Model | Nov 13, 2017 |

I What does it mean: "up to total derivatives" | May 9, 2017 |

I Covariant derivative of field strength tensor | Jan 5, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**