Derivation of energy and angular momentum (Schwarzschild metric)

Lambda96
Messages
233
Reaction score
77
Homework Statement
Derive the equations ##E= mc^2 \bigl( 1- \frac{r_s}{r} \bigr) \dot{t}## and ##l=mr^2 \dot{\varphi}##
Relevant Equations
none
Hi,

Unfortunately, I can't quite work out the terms in the task

Bildschirmfoto 2025-01-21 um 14.58.16.png

Bildschirmfoto 2025-01-21 um 14.58.41.png


The expression in the integral (4) corresponds to the Lagrangian and since ##t## and ##\varphi## are cyclic variables, the following follows:

$$-\frac{d}{dt} \frac{d L}{d \dot{t}}=0 \quad \rightarrow \quad -\frac{d L}{d \dot{t}}=const=E$$

$$-\frac{d}{dt} \frac{d L}{d \dot{\varphi}}=0 \quad \rightarrow \quad -\frac{d L}{d \dot{\varphi}}=const=l$$

Then I received the following:

$$\frac{d}{d \dot{t}} \Bigl( m \bigl( 1- \frac{r_s}{r} \bigr) c^2 \dot{t}^2 \Bigr)= 2m \bigl( 1- \frac{r_s}{r} \bigr) c^2 \dot{t} =E$$

$$\frac{d}{d \dot{\varphi}} \Bigl( m r^2 \dot{\varphi}^2 \Bigr)= 2m r^2 \dot{\varphi}=l$$

I get the same results except for the 2, just my question, did I do something wrong or was the 2 forgotten in the task sheet?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You simply called what is usually called ##E## by ##2E## and the same for angular momentum. If ##E## is constant, then obviously ##2E## is constant as well.
 
As Orodruin says, you can simply take the 2 into the definition of the constant, or not. It makes no difference to the orbits.

However, the reason for the book not having a 2 is that they've chosen their constants to match up to customary definitions. For example, instead of defining ##-dL/d\dot{t}=E## you could have used ##-dL/d\dot{t}=A## where ##A## is an unknown constant. Then you'd get to ##2m\left(1-\frac{r_s}r\right)c^2\dot{t}=A##. Now consider an orbit where the particle comes instantaneously to rest at infinity. What happens to the LHS? And hence how would you define ##A##?

Essentially, you jumped in a bit early with assuming the first constant you saw was ##E##. If you don't assume that and instead use a generic unknown constant, then you can find a case where you can write that constant in terms of what you know.
 
Thanks Orodruin for your help 👍, I thought I had done something wrong I hadn't thought of this simple observation :smile:

Thanks also Ibix for your help 👍
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top