MHB Derivation of Equation (11) from R Boundary Condition

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Membrane Paper
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
http://www.vibsys.put.poznan.pl/journal/2010-24/noga-2.pdf

Equations (9) leads to (11).

How from R boundary condition do we end up with the equation in (11)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dwsmith said:
http://www.vibsys.put.poznan.pl/journal/2010-24/noga-2.pdf

Equations (9) leads to (11).

How from R boundary condition do we end up with the equation in (11)?

Ok so I figured out what they have done but what does this equation do for them?
 
I have the equation ##F^x=m\frac {d}{dt}(\gamma v^x)##, where ##\gamma## is the Lorentz factor, and ##x## is a superscript, not an exponent. In my textbook the solution is given as ##\frac {F^x}{m}t=\frac {v^x}{\sqrt {1-v^{x^2}/c^2}}##. What bothers me is, when I separate the variables I get ##\frac {F^x}{m}dt=d(\gamma v^x)##. Can I simply consider ##d(\gamma v^x)## the variable of integration without any further considerations? Can I simply make the substitution ##\gamma v^x = u## and then...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K