Derivation of the Boltzmann Distribution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of the Boltzmann Distribution using McQuarrie's "Statistical Mechanics." The user expresses confusion regarding the maximization of the occupation numbers and the appearance of an extra -1 term in the derived equations. This term is clarified as originating from Stirling's series, which is used in the asymptotic expansion of the logarithm. Additionally, the user seeks clearer guidance on determining the parameter alpha in the derivation process. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in statistical mechanics and the nuances in different textbook approaches.
scorpion990
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
I'm using McQuarrie's "Statistical Mechanics" for a class, and I'm not quite understanding the the derivation of the Boltzmann Distribution. I'm going to go through it, and then ask a few questions along the way.

All right. You start with a canonical ensemble with N, V, and T fixed. Heat can be exchanged between microsystems, but matter cannot. Each microsystem has a spectrum of energies E1, E2, E3, ... that are repeated for degeneracy as needed. The occupation numbers of each energy state are denoted by a1, a2, a3, etc, and represent the number of microstates that are in energy stated E1, E2, E3, etc.

Imagine that each energy level is a "box" that contains as many particles as its occupation number. A specific distribution of occupation numbers can be achieved in:
W(a) = \sum^{n}_{i=1}\frac{A!}{\prod^{n}_{i=1}a_{i}!}
So that:
ln(W(a)) = Aln(A) - A - \sum^{n}_{i=1}ln(a_{i}!) =Aln(A) - A - \sum^{n}_{i=1}(a_{i}ln(a_{i})-a_{i})
Subject to the constraints:
\sum^{n}_{i=1}a_{i}=A
and
\sum^{n}_{i=1}E_{i}a_{i}=\zeta

Now.. Here's where many books and I disagree... They say that the set of equations derived by maximizing the above system is:
-ln(a_{i})-\alpha-1 - \beta E_{i} = 0

However, when I do it out, I get:
-ln(a_{i})-\alpha - \beta E_{i} = 0

I have no idea where their extra -1 term come from.

In addition, I don't understand most books' method of finding alpha. can somebody guide me through this process more clearly? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi.

scorpion990 said:
Now.. Here's where many books and I disagree... They say that the set of equations derived by maximizing the above system is:
-ln(a_{i})-\alpha-1 - \beta E_{i} = 0

-1 comes from Stirling's series, the asymptotic expansion of the logarithm.

Regards.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top