Derivation of waveguide condition for two light rays

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the derivation of equation (6) related to the phase difference between two light rays in a waveguide. It highlights that ray 1A incurs a phase change due to total internal reflection, while ray 2A' travels a different distance, leading to a phase difference. The equation AC - A'C = 2*(a-y)*cos(θm) is mentioned, with θ being the angle at the interface. There is frustration expressed over the lack of clarity in the derivation and the suggestion that it is left as an exercise for the reader. Overall, the participants seek further clarification and understanding of the derivation process.
loginorsinup
Messages
54
Reaction score
2
How did they derive equation (6)?

tOtt40d.png


I don't like how they say -Φm instead of Φm, but that aside, I get that both rays 1A and 2A' travel the same distance, but AC incurs a phase change due to total internal reflection (-Φm) and it travels AC from there. Meanwhile, A'C is the distance the other ray travels. So the difference between these two is what sets the phase difference between the two.

Somehow, they made AC - A'C = 2*(a-y)*cos(θm) it seems. I should note that the angle that is split into two by the perpendicular line (really an arrow) is 2θ, so the angle by A, C, and the interface is θ. Beyond that, I don't really know how to approach this. They conveniently said it is left as an exercise for the reader, but that always seems like laziness to me. It's not clear to me where it came from and I've spent several hours trying to "get it."
 
Science news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 
I haven't figured this out since I posted, no. I'm still curious where this came from. It's not actually relevant to the rest of the chapter. I think somehow (a-y) might be a hypotenuse? But I don't see it.
 
What is Equation (3)?
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top