Derivative of Exponential Functions with Other Logs

AI Thread Summary
The derivative of an exponential function can be calculated using logarithms of bases other than e, such as base 10 or 2, but it will introduce an additional constant due to the chain rule. The change of base formula for logarithms allows for this calculation, and rewriting the exponential in a different base simplifies the process. The base e is unique because it results in a derivative constant of 1 after differentiation. To derive using a different base, one can start with the expression for the function and apply the properties of logarithms. Understanding these principles is essential for correctly computing derivatives of exponential functions in various bases.
V0ODO0CH1LD
Messages
278
Reaction score
0
Can the derivative of an exponential function be calculated with logs base something other than e? Like base 10 or 2?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
An example of what you're trying to do would be welcome.
 
You can, but you will get an extra constant from the chain rule. Just use a change of base formula for log or rewrite an exponential in some other base and the term comes right out.

##e## is important precisely because it's the only base of the exponential where after differentiating the constant is ##1##.
 
theorem4.5.9 said:
You can, but you will get an extra constant from the chain rule. Just use a change of base formula for log or rewrite an exponential in some other base and the term comes right out.

##e## is important precisely because it's the only base of the exponential where after differentiating the constant is ##1##.

Could you maybe expand on that? Or point out somewhere where I could read about it?

If I start with "f(x+Δx) - f(x) = a^(x+Δx) - a^x" how do I continue with log_2 or anything else from here? Would I even go to that being equal to "a^x * (a^Δx - 1)"?
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top