Derivative when you just have Constraints

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on extending the concept of derivatives in the context of constraints among real variables. When a function g defines constraints, such as g(x)=0, and is differentiable, it creates a manifold of lower dimension. For example, the constraint g(x)=x_1^2+x_2^2-1 describes a unit circle, allowing the definition of derivatives between manifolds. To compute partial derivatives concretely, local coordinates or charts on the manifold are necessary. This approach enables the calculation of derivatives, such as \(\frac{dx_1}{dx_2}\big|_{x_1=x_2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}} = -1\), by parametrizing the circle with respect to one variable.
mXSCNT
Messages
310
Reaction score
1
Suppose that you have a set of real variables {x1,x2,...,xn}. If x1 = f(x2,x3,...,xn) then this represents a constraint on all the variables. In this case, it's possible to find dx1/dxi as long as f is differentiable. But not all possible constraints among the xj are of this form. How might one extend the concept of derivative to the case when the constraint on all the variables is not necessarily that one variable is a function of the others?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the world of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differential_manifold" !

Suppose you have a differentiable function g:\mathbb{R}^n\to\mathbb{R}^k and your constraints are given by the equation g(x)=0 (this is the general form). If the function g is "nice", for example if 0 is a regular value of g, then the set where g(x)=0 is a differentiable manifold of dimension n-k. As an example, take g(x)=x_1^2+x_2^2-1, then the resulting manifold is the unit circle.
One can then define the derivative of a differentiable function between manifolds abstractly, but to get partial derivatives (and do concrete calculations) you need to choose local coordinates (aka a chart) on the manifold.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Does your example allow you to say that \frac{dx_1}{dx_2}\big|_{x_1=x_2=\frac{1}{\sqrt(2)}} = -1?
 
Yes, x_1 defines a real-valued function on the unit circle, and near the point (1/\sqrt{2},1/\sqrt{2}) one can "parametrize" the circle by x_2, i.e. x_2 gives differentiable local coordinates. In these coordinates x_1=\sqrt{1-x_2^2} and you can simply compute the usual derivative.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top