Derivatives of 2pi-periodic functions

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Charles49
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivatives Functions
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 4K views
Charles49
Messages
87
Reaction score
0
Suppose [tex]u(x)[/tex] is periodic with period [tex]2\pi[/tex]. Also [tex]m\le u(x)\le M[/tex].

Then is it possible for some derivatives of [tex]u(x)[/tex] to be outside [tex][m, M][/tex]? In other words, can any derivative be 2pi-periodic and have a different amplitude?

When [tex]u(x)[/tex] is a sine curve, then it is not true because, the frequency of [tex]u(x)[/tex] is exactly 1. The derivatives cannot change the amplitude since the frequency is exactly one and the chain rule doesn't affect the amplitude.

However, I think it is possible when you construct a periodic function which is a sum of infinite sine curves. I am not sure how to construct such an example which is smooth. The smoothness requirement ensures that it is not easy to construct such a function which can be decomposed into a finite number of sine curves.

Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Charles49 said:
Suppose [tex]u(x)[/tex] is periodic with period [tex]2\pi[/tex]. Also [tex]m\le u(x)\le M[/tex].

Then is it possible for some derivatives of [tex]u(x)[/tex] to be outside [tex][m, M][/tex]? In other words, can any derivative be 2pi-periodic and have a different amplitude?

When [tex]u(x)[/tex] is a sine curve, then it is not true because, the frequency of [tex]u(x)[/tex] is exactly 1. The derivatives cannot change the amplitude since the frequency is exactly one and the chain rule doesn't affect the amplitude.

However, I think it is possible when you construct a periodic function which is a sum of infinite sine curves. I am not sure how to construct such an example which is smooth. The smoothness requirement ensures that it is not easy to construct such a function which can be decomposed into a finite number of sine curves.

Any thoughts?

Why are you constraining the frequency to be one?
 
AlephZero said:
You don't need to worry about an infinite number of functions. Just think about something like

u(x) = sin(x) + sin(100x)
u'(x) = cos(x) + 100 cos(100 x)

Thanks, AlephZero, i feel stupid now...