Derive an equation for the maximum bending moment

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving an equation for the maximum bending moment in a beam, with a focus on the relationship between measured strain and bending moment. Participants explore theoretical and experimental aspects of this relationship, including the use of strain gauges and the implications of various parameters in the equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests deriving an equation for bending moment from strain measurements, proposing M/I = σ/y = E/R as a starting point.
  • Another participant questions the definitions of "strain" and "bending moment," prompting a discussion on how these concepts are interrelated.
  • A participant mentions the relationship between tensile strain, radius of curvature, and distance from the neutral axis, indicating a foundational concept in beam bending.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about their derived equations, with one proposing M = EIk and another suggesting M = EIεmax/ymax, where εmax is the maximum strain measured.
  • There is a discussion about the relevance of previous threads and whether earlier equations were derived correctly, with some participants seeking clarification on their understanding.
  • One participant describes their process of deriving equations involving strain and curvature, leading to a proposed relationship between bending moment and strain.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of measuring strain at the surface and how it relates to the radius of curvature and bending moment.
  • Some participants express confusion about the derivation process and seek guidance on how to approach the problem effectively.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a range of views on the correct approach to deriving the bending moment equation, with no consensus reached on the validity of specific equations or methods. There is ongoing uncertainty and exploration of the relationships between strain, curvature, and bending moment.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of clarity regarding the beam's thickness and width in their derivations, which may affect the equations being discussed. There is also mention of the need for a deeper understanding of the underlying concepts, such as bending moment and strain, to effectively engage with the problem.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and practitioners in physics and engineering who are interested in the mechanics of materials, particularly in understanding the relationship between strain and bending moments in beams.

Big Jock
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
The calculation for the maximum bending moment is to be verified
experimentally using a strain gauge bonded to the outer surface of the
beam, at the point where the maximum bending moment occurs.
Derive an equation which could be used to calculate the bending
moment from the measured strain value. State the meaning of all
symbols used in your equation


M/I = σ/y = E/R



my attempt so far is

M= E/R x I
Totally unsure if that is correct and really be doing with a hand from someone more clued up than I am.

Many thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please explain your reasoning.

What is "strain" as measured by the gauge?
What is "bending moment"?
Do you see that these concepts will be related? How does bending moment give rise to strain?
 
Have you learned the relationship between the tensile strain, the radius of curvature, and the distance from the neutral axis?

Chet
 
Eventually got there I believe with a final answer of

M= EIk would that be correct?

Have all the workings etc to prove it...
 
So what I have is wrong your telling me?... I seen that thread a long time ago and thought it was irrelevant as he was using the max strain plus it was hardly a derived equation. If you can shed anymore light please do...
 
Big Jock said:
So what I have is wrong your telling me?... I seen that thread a long time ago and thought it was irrelevant as he was using the max strain plus it was hardly a derived equation. If you can shed anymore light please do...
You are supposed to express the answer in terms of the maximum strain. The maximum strain ε is equal to the distance t of the outer surface from the neutral axis divided by the radius of curvature:

ε = t/R

So R = t/ε

You are supposed to substitute this for R into your equation for the bending moment to get the relationship between the bending moment and the maximum strain (at the outside of the bend).

Chet
 
I started by taking k=1/R= change in radians/ change in x
when I calculated the strain for my equation I had strain= change in length/original length
then strain = (radius of curvature - distance from the neutral axis)x change in radians-radius of curvature x change in radians.
Which got me to strain = -y/r
stress = Youngs modulus x strain
stress= -youngs modulus x distance from neutral axis/ radius of curvature.
Which I integrated down to M= EI/r
then I got to EIk

also there is no mention what so ever of the beams thickness of width that is why I went down this route
 
Big Jock said:
I started by taking k=1/R= change in radians/ change in x
when I calculated the strain for my equation I had strain= change in length/original length
then strain = (radius of curvature - distance from the neutral axis)x change in radians-radius of curvature x change in radians.
Which got me to strain = -y/r
stress = Youngs modulus x strain
stress= -youngs modulus x distance from neutral axis/ radius of curvature.
Which I integrated down to M= EI/r
then I got to EIk

also there is no mention what so ever of the beams thickness of width that is why I went down this route
I think the answer they were looking for was M=EIεmax/ymax, where εmax is the measured tensile strain on the outside of the bend.
 
  • #10
so what I have derived in the strain section is wrong. Can you send me a link to show how this works or list the workings please, to tidy it up as it would seem Iam not to far away...
 
  • #11
Big Jock said:
so what I have derived in the strain section is wrong. Can you send me a link to show how this works or list the workings please, to tidy it up as it would seem Iam not to far away...
You have the correct equation for the strain as a function of y, but the strain is being measured only at the surface where y = ymax. The idea is to measure the strain at the surface, and, from that, determine the bending moment. You know that the strain at the surface is equal to the distance of the surface from the neutral axis divided by the radius of curvature. So, by measuring the strain at the surface and the distance of the surface from the neutral axis, you know the radius of curvature. Once the radius of curvature is known, the bending moment is known from EI/R. What you were being asked to do was to eliminate R from the two equations, and calculate M as a function of εmax. I hope this makes sense.

Chet
 
  • #12
Got lost a bit now...How do I do this? I only ask as I have never been taught about this.

strain is being measured only at the surface where y = ymax. The idea is to measure the strain at the surface, and, from that, determine the bending moment. You know that the strain at the surface is equal to the distance of the surface from the neutral axis divided by the radius of curvature. So, by measuring the strain at the surface and the distance of the surface from the neutral axis, you know the radius of curvature
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Big Jock said:
Got lost a bit now...How do I do this?

strain is being measured only at the surface where y = ymax. The idea is to measure the strain at the surface, and, from that, determine the bending moment. You know that the strain at the surface is equal to the distance of the surface from the neutral axis divided by the radius of curvature. So, by measuring the strain at the surface and the distance of the surface from the neutral axis, you know the radius of curvature
You measure the strain εmax at the outer surface of the beam. This strain is related to the radius of curvature R and the distance of the surface from the neutral axis ymax by

εmax=ymax/R

The bending moment M is related to the radius of curvature R by:

M=EI/R

If we combine these two equations, we get

M = EIεmax/ymax

Using this equation, if you measure the strain on the outer surface of the beam, you can calculate the bending moment. So this is an indirect method of experimentally determining the bending moment.
 
  • #14
@Big Jock - you got lucky. We don't normally do your homework for you.
It looks like you didn't understand the experiment you were doing.
The relationship between stuff in equations and stuff you measure is very important to understanding physics.
Best practice is to review a lab class a couple of days beforehand to make sure you understand it.
The derivation is one of the things you could have done beforehand.
(Assuming, of course, that you get the lab notes/instructions before the lab...)
 
  • #15
Simon our right I don't follow this procedure as I am learning online doing this all myself. I don't have access to lab classes so if you can point me in the right direction I would be grateful...
 
  • #16
Oh I see - for future point out that it is self-study, not homework.

The problem you described was for a practical physics or engineering exercise - typically called a "lab class".
A student would go to a special room that includes the bar already set up with a strain-gauge and everything and they'd have to carry out the experiment.

To understand what Chestermiller is telling you, you need to go back and make sure you understand the concepts you need. Their definitions and descriptions will be in the resources you are using.
You need to know what "bending moment" is etc.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
23K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
62
Views
24K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K