Derive conservation of center of mass position

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the conservation of center of mass (CoM) position for a mass m on a frictionless boat of mass M. When mass m is moved from one end of the boat to the other, the boat shifts in the opposite direction to maintain the CoM position. The formula for conservation of mass is presented, showing that the CoM remains constant when external forces are negligible. This is linked to the principle of conservation of momentum, where the total momentum of the system must remain zero throughout the motion. The conclusion emphasizes that the CoM position must remain unchanged due to the relationship between momentum and the CoM velocity.
Jonsson
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Hello there,

If a mass, m, is placed at one end of an boat of mass M, which is located on a frictionless ocean. If the mass, m, is moved from one end of the boat to the other end, conservation of center of mass position ensures that the boat shifts a small distance in the opposite direction. The conservation of mass is given by: $$\frac{x_1\,m+x_2\,M}{m+M} = \frac{\tilde{x_1}\,m+\tilde{x_2}\,M}{m+M}$$ where each x equal the position of the masses.

How can I derive this forumla from more fundamental physics?

Thank you for your time,

Kind regards,
Marius

PS: how can I most easily do inline latex? Is it possible to do something similar to $expr$? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This has to do with conservation of momentum. You can show that for the system as a whole to have 0 momentum throughout the motion of the mass m, the center of mass position must not move. This assumes that the external forces are 0 and so by Newton's second law dp/dt=0, and in a frame where p(t=0)=0, dp/dt=0 for all t implies p(t)=0 for all t.

In the above, p stands for the momentum of the entire object (m+M). From this it can be derived that the CoM position must not move because p=(m+M)V_CoM.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top