Derive the Maxwell "with source" equation

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
We need to derive the Maxwell "with source" equation, of course, using the tensor equation $$\partial F^{\mu v}/ \partial x^{v} = j^{\mu}/c$$

D is the spacetime dimension
To do this, it was said to us vary the action wrt the ##A^{\mu}##

1616792994917.png


The first term just vanish, and I want to evaluate the third term.
$$\frac{-1}{4c} \int d^{D}x (\partial_{\mu} \delta A_{v} - \partial_{v} \delta A_{\mu})(\partial^{\mu} \delta A^{v} - \partial^{v} \delta A^{\mu})$$
$$\frac{-1}{4c} \int d^{D}x 2((\partial_{\mu} \delta A_{v})(\partial^{\mu} \delta A^{v}) - (\partial_{\mu} \delta A_{v})(\partial^{v} \delta A^{\mu})$$
$$\frac{-1}{2c} \int d^{D}x (\partial_{\mu} \delta A_{v}) \delta F^{\mu v} *$$

After that equation, the things get pretty messy... My attempt was to find somewhere a way to apply the divergence theorem and get the flux, after that i would get the charge density and so the current, but i was not able to do that

OBS: in * i am considering that ##\partial \delta A = \delta \partial A##, but i am not sure 'bout that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's fine, because you don't vary the space-time arguments ##x## in Hamilton's principle. However you wrote some ##\delta## too much. Note that ##\delta (F_{\mu \nu} F^{\mu \nu})=2 F_{\mu \nu} \delta F^{\mu \nu}=4 F_{\mu \nu} \delta \partial^{\mu} A^{\nu}## and now go on in calculating the variation such to make the integrand ##\propto \delta A^{\nu}##.

For the 2nd term, I'd write it out in explicit form. Also think about, how ##j^{\mu}(x)## looks for a single point particle!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top