Derive the Venturi Meter eqn from the Bernoulli eqn

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the Venturi meter equation from the Bernoulli equation while addressing issues with LaTeX formatting. The user identifies a contradiction in their equations, noting that pressure at point 2 (p2) must be less than at point 1 (p1) due to increased velocity, but their substitutions suggest otherwise. They seek clarification on expressing p1 in terms of other variables and relating p2 to another pressure term. Acknowledgment of the contradiction leads to a clearer understanding of the physical principles involved. The conversation highlights the importance of consistent variable definitions in fluid dynamics equations.
GreyNoise
Gold Member
Messages
32
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
By applying Bernoulli's equation and the equation of continuity to points 1 and 2 of Fig. 16-14 [see attached file], show that the speed of the flow at the entrance is
v1 = a*sqrt{(2(dens' - dens)gh)/(dens(A^2-a^2))}
Relevant Equations
0.5*dens*v_1^2 + p_1 = 0.5*dens*v_2^2 + p_2 Bernoulii eqn
A*v_1 = a*v_2 continuity eqn
Advanced apologies for this format; I am posting my question as an the image b/c the Latex is being very buggy with me, and I lost a kind of lengthy post to it. Can anyone show me what I am doing wrong? I have attached a pdf version for easier reading if need be.
pr-43-p-290-h-r-text-ed.jpg
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
GreyNoise said:
1657147269864.png


From equation (1) you can see that ##p_2## must be less than ##p_1## because ##v_2 > v_1## (from the continuity equation). So, ##p_2 < p_1##.

However, in equation (2) you let ##p_1 = \rho g h## and ##p_2 =\rho' \, gh##.
But ##\rho' \, > \rho##. So, these substitutions would imply that ##p_2 > p_1##, which contradicts ##p_2 < p_1##. So, letting ##p_1 = \rho g h## and ##p_2 =\rho' \, gh## can't be correct.

Assume we can take points 1 and 2 to be at the same horizontal level:
1657148480656.png


Introduce the height ##H## as shown. Can you express ##p_1## in terms of ##p_c## , ##\rho##, ##g##, ##H##, and ##h##? Likewise, can you relate ##p_2## and ##p_d##?
 
Thnx so much for the response TNsy. Pointing out my contradiction between lines (1) and (2) was the big aha moment for me, and including the ##\rho gH## term makes the physical sense clear now.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top