Derive the Venturi Meter eqn from the Bernoulli eqn

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the Venturi Meter equation from the Bernoulli equation, highlighting a contradiction in pressure terms. The user identifies that if \( p_1 = \rho g h \) and \( p_2 = \rho' g h \), then \( \rho' > \rho \) leads to \( p_2 > p_1 \), which contradicts the continuity equation's implication that \( p_2 < p_1 \). The user seeks clarification on expressing \( p_1 \) in terms of \( p_c \), \( \rho \), \( g \), \( H \), and \( h \), and how to relate \( p_2 \) and \( p_d \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bernoulli's equation and its applications
  • Familiarity with fluid dynamics concepts, particularly the continuity equation
  • Knowledge of pressure and density relationships in fluid mechanics
  • Ability to manipulate equations involving variables such as \( \rho \), \( g \), \( H \), and \( h \)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Venturi Meter equation from Bernoulli's principle
  • Learn about the implications of fluid density variations in pressure calculations
  • Explore practical applications of the Venturi effect in engineering
  • Investigate the role of height differences in fluid pressure equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in fluid mechanics, engineers designing flow measurement devices, and anyone interested in the principles of fluid dynamics and pressure relationships.

GreyNoise
Gold Member
Messages
32
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
By applying Bernoulli's equation and the equation of continuity to points 1 and 2 of Fig. 16-14 [see attached file], show that the speed of the flow at the entrance is
v1 = a*sqrt{(2(dens' - dens)gh)/(dens(A^2-a^2))}
Relevant Equations
0.5*dens*v_1^2 + p_1 = 0.5*dens*v_2^2 + p_2 Bernoulii eqn
A*v_1 = a*v_2 continuity eqn
Advanced apologies for this format; I am posting my question as an the image b/c the Latex is being very buggy with me, and I lost a kind of lengthy post to it. Can anyone show me what I am doing wrong? I have attached a pdf version for easier reading if need be.
pr-43-p-290-h-r-text-ed.jpg
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
GreyNoise said:
1657147269864.png


From equation (1) you can see that ##p_2## must be less than ##p_1## because ##v_2 > v_1## (from the continuity equation). So, ##p_2 < p_1##.

However, in equation (2) you let ##p_1 = \rho g h## and ##p_2 =\rho' \, gh##.
But ##\rho' \, > \rho##. So, these substitutions would imply that ##p_2 > p_1##, which contradicts ##p_2 < p_1##. So, letting ##p_1 = \rho g h## and ##p_2 =\rho' \, gh## can't be correct.

Assume we can take points 1 and 2 to be at the same horizontal level:
1657148480656.png


Introduce the height ##H## as shown. Can you express ##p_1## in terms of ##p_c## , ##\rho##, ##g##, ##H##, and ##h##? Likewise, can you relate ##p_2## and ##p_d##?
 
Thnx so much for the response TNsy. Pointing out my contradiction between lines (1) and (2) was the big aha moment for me, and including the ##\rho gH## term makes the physical sense clear now.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K