Deriving a formula for Impedance for an AC circuit

Battlemage!
Messages
292
Reaction score
44

Homework Statement



Find the impedance of the circuit (R and L in series, and then C in parallel with them). A circuit is said to be in resonance if Z is real; find ω in terms of R, L, and C at resonance.

Here is the circuit:

http://img382.imageshack.us/my.php?image=g...ccircuitgf5.png


Homework Equations



The objective is to derive the equation. I'm not really sure where to start.

The Attempt at a Solution



For whatever reason, I never covered impedance of an AC circuit in intro physics II. Now in my mathematical methods of physics class we have a problem that requires you to work with it. I have no idea what to do here, and I'm certain something like this will be on the test next week. Basically, the only thing I am asking for is hints on where to start.

It would be appreciated if

a.) someone helped me with where to start

b.) someone posted links to remedial topics on AC circuits (as I said, we didn't not cover much with AC circuits in Physics II)


Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://webhw.unca.edu/roberts_phys222/Content/chapters/s11/11_resonance.asp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Battlemage!, does your textbook or class notes give equations for the impedance of resistors, capacitors, and inductors separately?

Once you have those, they combine just like resistors do in terms of series and parallel components.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top