Deriving Average Energy of an Oscillator: Thermal Radiation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the average energy of a harmonic oscillator using Planck's model, which involves discrete energy levels and the Boltzmann probability distribution. Participants express confusion about the concepts and seek clarification on the derivation process. A recommended resource for understanding these topics is the book "Quantum Physics of Atoms, Molecules, Solids, Nuclei, and Particles" by R. Eisberg and R. Resnick, noted for its clarity. The conversation highlights the challenge of grasping quantum mechanics principles and the importance of finding accessible educational materials. Understanding these foundational concepts is crucial for further study in quantum physics.
sai2020
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
The question:

In 1900, Planck used an abstract model consisting of harmonic oscillators with various frequency. Derive an average energy \bar{\epsilon} of a single oscillator where the oscillators of frequency f can only take on discrete energies \epsilon_{n} = nhf, n=0, 1, 2, ... and the Boltzmann probability distribution, P(\epsilon_{n}) = exp(-\epsilon_{n} / k_{B}T). (Note: Boltzmann showed that the probability for a system at equilibrium to have an energy E is proportional to exp(-\epsilon_{n} / k_{B} T, where k_{B} is the Boltzmann constant.

I have no idea what he is talking about and my textbook doesn't say anything either. Can someone point me to a good book about these stuff?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
R. Eisberg, R. Resnick
Quantum physics of atoms, molecules, solids, nuclei and participles
 
Thanks a lot. It's a beautiful book
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top