Deriving equations involving sin and cos

  • Thread starter Thread starter thezac11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cos deriving Sin
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving equations related to the displacement of a light ray as it travels through a glass medium. The first equation provided is manipulated to derive a second equation using Snell's Law and trigonometric identities. Participants emphasize the importance of factoring and simplifying terms to achieve the desired form. A third equation is introduced, which approximates displacement for small incident angles, prompting further discussion on eliminating sine and cosine terms. The use of series expansions for sine and cosine is suggested as a method to simplify the derivation process.
thezac11
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This problem deals with the displacement of a light ray as it travels through a glass medium.

Starting with the equation #1: d=S[sin(i)cos(r)-cos(i)sin(r)]

(where d=the length of displacement of the light ray in the glass medium, i=angle of incidence, r=angle of refraction in the glass medium, S=the length of the light ray in the glass medium)

equation #2: d=tsin(i)[1-(cos(i)/(n^2-sin^2(i))^1/2)]

(where t=the glass thickness, n=the index of refraction of the glass)

-Derive equation #2 from equation #1


Homework Equations



Snell's Law: (n1)(sin(angle1)) = (n2)(sin(angle2))

n=1 for the air medium outside the glassk,k,k,

d=(S)[sin(i-r)]=equation #2

(S)[cos(r)]=t




The Attempt at a Solution



My attempt is long and messy and has got me nowhere. Any help would be greatly appreciate.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just work it simply as if you're "massaging" Eq1 to Eq2. You know they're equal, just do whatever you can mathematically to make it LOOK the same (which means, BE the same, but still).

I:

Distributed S
d=Ssin(i)cos(r)-Scos(i)sin(r)​
Substituted your supplied t=Scos(r)
d=tsin(i)-Scos(i)sin(r)​
Factored out tsin(i) from both terms
d=tsin(i)[1-(Scos(i)sin(r))/(Scos(r)sin(i))]​

Factoring might look bad and make it look more complicated, but the point is that Eq2 has that tsin(i) out front. So you take it out, and now that part of Eq2 doesn't have to be manipulated, and you got that 1- as well! So now it's a matter of dealing with the second term in there, and the S's cancel.

I think that's enough of a start for you. Use Snell's law and the fact that cos2+sin2=1...I left out the arguments because so long as the arguments of the trig functions are the same, the identity holds. Then it's a bit of manipulation (and sorry, that radical is inconvenient but necessary) and setting n1(air)=1, and you arrive at the final equation.
 
Thanks, that was just the help I needed!

Now I've been asked to derive a third equation from equation #2.

equation #3: d=ti(n-1)/n , this equation approximates the displacement for small incident angles(i).

(where i is measured in radians, n=index of refraction of the glass, note that d=0 when i=0, and d=t when i=3.14/2)

-I can't figure out how to get rid of the cos and sin's from equation #2 properly. If someone would be able to point me in the right direction I would be extremely grateful.
 
thezac11 said:
Thanks, that was just the help I needed!

Now I've been asked to derive a third equation from equation #2.

equation #3: d=ti(n-1)/n , this equation approximates the displacement for small incident angles(i).

(where i is measured in radians, n=index of refraction of the glass, note that d=0 when i=0, and d=t when i=3.14/2)

-I can't figure out how to get rid of the cos and sin's from equation #2 properly. If someone would be able to point me in the right direction I would be extremely grateful.

You need to know the series expansions of sin(theta) and cos(theta). You can tell from Eq3 that they approximated sin(i) ~~ i. What then does cos(i)~~ ?

Look up the series expansions of sin and cos and truncate them to one term. Then plug that in for sin and cos and then a small amount of manipulation of the approximated Eq2 should reveal itself.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top