Deriving Larmor frequency problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the derivation of the Larmor frequency and the behavior of the magnetic moment vector, ##\vec{\mu}##, in relation to the magnetic field vector, ##\vec{B}##. It highlights that when ##\vec{\mu}## and ##\vec{B}## are not aligned, the cross product is non-zero, leading to a change in ##\vec{\mu}## over time, which results in circular motion. The reasoning involves constructing infinitesimal vectors perpendicular to both ##\vec{\mu}## and ##\vec{B}##, illustrating how successive additions create a circular path. The discussion emphasizes that the assumption of non-alignment is crucial for the application of the relevant equations. Overall, the circular motion of ##\vec{\mu}## is derived from the continuous perpendicular changes influenced by the magnetic field.
fisher garry
Messages
63
Reaction score
1
upload_2017-6-22_0-53-7.png

upload_2017-6-22_0-53-44.png


I don't get how they get Eq. 5. Why is the direction of ##\mu## going outwards from the direction of B? And why does the fact that ##\frac{d\mu}{dt}## is perpendicular to both ##\mu## and ##B## mean that ##\mu## goes in circle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All that they are assuming is that ##\vec{\mu}## and ##\vec{B}## are not aligned. If they are aligned, then the equation does not apply, since then the cross product is zero, so that there is no change in ##\vec{\mu}##. But they are assuming that they are not aligned, and that the equation does apply.

As for why it goes in a circle... Start with two vectors. Call them ##\vec{\mu}## and ##\vec{B}##. Now draw a third, infinitesimal, vector perpendicular to both ##\vec{\mu}## and ##\vec{B}##, call this third vector ##\vec{\delta}##. Form the sum ##\vec{\mu} + \vec{\delta} = \vec{\mu '}##. Now draw another infinitesimal vector perpendicular to ##\vec{\mu '}## and ##\vec{B}##. Add that one to ##\vec{\mu '}## to form ##\vec{\mu ''}##. Keep doing that forever. You'll find that you've drawn a circle.
 
  • Like
Likes fisher garry
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top