A Deriving the standard normal distribution

rabbed
Messages
241
Reaction score
3
I've calculated the joint distribution, XY_PDF(x,y) of random
variables X and Y (both coming from a distribution N(n) = C*e^(-K*n^2)).

I use XY_PDF(x,y) to calculate the joint distribution AR_PDF(a,r)
of the random variables A (angle) and R (radius), with the PDF
method and the Jacobian.

Since AR_PDF(a,r) = A_PDF(a)*R_PDF(r) and I want A_PDF(a) = 1/(2*pi),
I can find that C = 1/(2*pi)^(1/2) in N(n), since the other factors in
AR_PDF(a,r) calculated from XY_PDF(x,y) are related to R.

If I do the same in 3D (using the longitude/latitude/radius distributions
for producing a uniform surface distribution), I get C = 1/(2*pi)^(1/3)
after discarding the factors related to the longitude distribution and the
radius distribution.

The correct answer (for a multivariate gaussian) should be 1/(2*pi)^(1/2)
here also, right?

Is my reasoning to find this constant C wrong? Is there a better way?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need to perform the Cartesian to Polar transformation to calculate C. Just observe that the pdf N is that of a normal random variable with zero mean and variance ##\sigma^2=\frac{1}{2K}##. Then use the formula for a normal distribution to conclude that
$$C=\frac{1}{\sigma\sqrt{2\pi}}=\sqrt\frac{2K}{2\pi}$$
The formula you calculated above is missing the factor ##\sqrt{2K}##.
 
Is there no way to derive the standard normal distribution (not the normal distribution with concepts like mean and variance) from just basic knowledge of:
- The Jacobian
- How to calculate one joint distribution from another joint distribution using the PDF method
- Random vectors in 2D/3D (deriving the distributions of independent variables (polar/spherical coordinates) to get a uniform surface distribution by calculating the joint distribution of their dependent cartesian coordinates)
- Isotropy, wanting another kind of random vector by letting the cartesian coordinates be independent by coming from the same unknown distribution, N, as the radius
 
For a standard normal distribution in n dimensional Euclidean space Rn, I like to think of it just as the joint distribution of n independent 1-dimensional standard normal random variables. As such, its n-dimensional probability density function is just the product

(1/√(2π)) e-x12/2 ⋅ ... ⋅ (1/√(2π)) e-xn2/2

which is

(2π)-n/2 e-(x12 + ... + xn2)/2

or in other words

(2π)-n/2 e-r2/2,

where r is the distance from the origin in Euclidean n-space Rn.

I know this doesn't answer all parts of your question, but it's one easy way to remember the constant factor occurring in the n-dimensional standard normal density.
 
Thanks, zinq
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top