Deriving Wave Equation - Electric Field Inside Metal

H12504106
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider an electromagnetic wave hitting a metallic surface with conductivity σ
at normal incidence.
a) Derive the wave equation describing this situation. Hint: Use Ohm’s law, J = σE to
eliminate the current.
b) Solve the wave equation for the electric field to obtain the electric field inside the metal.
How far into the metal does the field propagate?

Homework Equations



The Maxwell Equations in matter:
\epsilon\nabla \cdot\vec{E} = \rho_f
\nabla \times \vec{E} = -\mu\dfrac{\partial \vec{H}}{\partial t}
\nabla \cdot \vec{H} = 0
\nabla \times \vec{H} = \sigma\vec{E} + \epsilon \dfrac{\partial \vec{E}}{\partial t}

The Attempt at a Solution



By manipulating the maxwell's equations above and using vector calculus, i can obtain the following:

\nabla^2\vec{E} = \mu\sigma\dfrac{\partial\vec{E}}{\partial t}+\mu\epsilon\dfrac{\partial^2 \vec{E}}{\partial t^2} and
\nabla^2\vec{H} = \mu\sigma\dfrac{\partial\vec{H}}{\partial t}+\mu\epsilon\dfrac{\partial^2 \vec{H}}{\partial t^2}.

But i can't proceed on with part (b). How do i solve the wave equation for the electirc field? Is the solution to this wave equation exponential?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi I solved past year in the course of partial differential equations, I rembember tha we use the separation of variables methods, I will search it, and if a I get I will tell you.
 
Sorry, I forget to say that the way we solved was a Fourier Series, (boundary conditions included)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top