Describe absorption experiment to distinguish 3 radiations

AI Thread Summary
An absorption experiment to distinguish between alpha, beta, and gamma radiation involves using specific absorbers and a suitable detector, such as a Geiger counter. Alpha particles can be stopped by a sheet of paper, beta particles by aluminum or lead, and gamma rays require thicker materials like concrete or lead for effective shielding. It is crucial to account for background radiation when measuring counts and to specify the thickness of the absorbers used. The penetration depth of particles varies based on their charge and kinetic energy, making it important to consider energy levels when identifying radiation types. Overall, a clear diagram and detailed explanation of the setup and measurements are essential for a comprehensive understanding of the experiment.
YES q THE zU19
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I could not fit the whole problem typed out but;

Describe with a diagram, an absorption experiment to distingush between alpha, beta and gamma radiation.

Homework Equations


None required, written question.

The Attempt at a Solution



Source, absorbers placed in front of suitable detector.
How results identify the source
Allowance for background radiation

The above is a more general answer.

Could I also use the below in my answer:
Alpha can be stopped by a sheet of paper, beta, by aluminum, and gamma by concrete.
Geiger counter alternatively.

I am having difficulty using a diagram too.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It gets a bit tricky because a high energy alpha particle may penetrate as far as a low energy beta particle. You'll have to decide if that is important.
The thickness of the absorber is also important ... how much paper, how much aluminium, how much concrete?

Of course you need to be specific: you have to explain how you account for background radiation, how the absorbers identify the source type, and how you use the geiger counter.
 
  • Like
Likes YES q THE zU19
Simon Bridge said:
It gets a bit tricky because a high energy alpha particle may penetrate as far as a low energy beta particle. You'll have to decide if that is important.
The thickness of the absorber is also important ... how much paper, how much aluminium, how much concrete?

Of course you need to be specific: you have to explain how you account for background radiation, how the absorbers identify the source type, and how you use the geiger counter.

All good points.

alpha ~ 0.2mm of paper
beta ~ 1mm Pb/1-10 mm Al
gamma ~ 1-10cm of Pb/Several m of concrete

Measure initial count and discount it from the radiation present?

Could you not just use paper for example, alpha won't be able to penetrate it then say that, that radiation is obviously alpha?

THanks for your help.
 
Could you not just use paper for example, alpha won't be able to penetrate it then say that, that radiation is obviously alpha?
How far a particle penetrates depends on how much charge it has and how much kinetic energy it has.
But you are generally correct ... if you know you have moderate energy particles, say from nuclear decay, then whatever is stopped by a sheet of paper is alphas, whatever is stopped by a few cm of iron is betas, and anything else is gammas. But this is a rule of thumb. If, for eg, you want to identify the particles in a cosmic ray source, then this rule won't work.

Note: Gamma ray shielding is usually made out of lead.
 
Simon Bridge said:
How far a particle penetrates depends on how much charge it has and how much kinetic energy it has.
But you are generally correct ... if you know you have moderate energy particles, say from nuclear decay, then whatever is stopped by a sheet of paper is alphas, whatever is stopped by a few cm of iron is betas, and anything else is gammas. But this is a rule of thumb. If, for eg, you want to identify the particles in a cosmic ray source, then this rule won't work.

Note: Gamma ray shielding is usually made out of lead.

Interesting idea I had not thought about that.

Yes I gather that. Thank you for your help.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top