Describe surfaces of equal pressure in a rotating fluid

AI Thread Summary
In a rotating fluid within a closed vessel, the surfaces of equal pressure form circular cylinders with their axis positioned at a height of g/Ω² above the rotation axis. The problem can be approached using the conservation of momentum and analyzing the forces acting on the fluid, including centrifugal effects. By simplifying the momentum equation and focusing on the pressure gradient, one can derive the relationship between pressure and radial distance from the axis of rotation. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding inviscid flow and the implications of neglecting the Coriolis effect. This theoretical framework provides insight into fluid dynamics in rotating systems.
amrasa81
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am trying to solve a basic question from a Fluid dynamics textbook. Could you help me with the answer? The question is as follows:

A closed vessel full of water is rotating with constant angular velocity \Omega about a horizontal axis. Show that the surfaces of equal pressure are circular cylinders whose common axis is at a height g/\Omega^{2} above the axis of rotation.

I don't know how to tackle this problem. Is there a technique in solving such theoretical questions?

Thanks,

P.S:- This is not a homework or coursework question. I am also new to Physics forum, and hence, my question may not be appropriate for this section. In that case please tell me in which section I should pose fluid dynamics questions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Interesting question... I only have a partial answer, working from Tritton's 'Physical Fluid Dynamics'. In it, he starts with:

\frac{Du}{Dt} =\frac{1}{\rho}\nabla p -\Omega \times \Omega \times r - 2\Omega \times u + \nu \nabla^{2} u +\rho g

So, assuming conservation of momentum, Du/Dt = 0. Also, the second term on the rhs can be written as
-\nabla (\frac{1}{2}\Omega^{2}r^{2})

and combined to give a reduced pressure

p - \frac{1}{2}\Omega^{2}r^{2}

Then, ignoring the Coriolus term and assuming inviscid flow, I can maybe see how you get the result you mention. Maybe...

hope this helps.
 
Thanks!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top