Designing RF Antennas: From Intuition to Simulation Tools

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheAnalogKid83
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antennas Design Rf
AI Thread Summary
The design of RF antennas, particularly for cellular applications, involves a combination of intuitive knowledge, iterative design, and mathematical principles, primarily based on Maxwell's equations. Designers often utilize sophisticated simulation tools, such as EZNEC, which allow for the input of specific geometries and parameters to predict antenna performance. The geometries of antennas, including those with fractal designs for broadband applications, are derived from a mix of empirical testing and computer simulations. Quad band cellular antennas are typically designed to target specific frequency bands, often incorporating multiple antennas to cover different ranges effectively. Overall, successful antenna design requires both theoretical understanding and practical adjustments based on simulation outputs.
TheAnalogKid83
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
I have a lot of general questions on the design of RF antennas.

Where do the geometries come from? I've been looking at embedded PCB antennas and also modules that attach to PCBs and they always have exotic looking notches and curves. Some are 3D while others are flat 2D styles. How does one actually arrive at such geometries mathematically? They seem so random and I know that their are exact subtleties to why the specific combination of geometries are in place, and even then, these geometries depend on the materials being used.

In the cellular industry, is it mostly intuitive knowledge combined with an iterative design approach that these designers come to their final antenna design, or do they use special design tools/simulations or mathematics/physics theory to get there? I know its probably a combination, but I'm wondering what it takes to actually design an antenna.

I'm particularly interested in the design of cellular quad band passive antennas, so if anyone has any experience or suggestions on where to start, I would appreciate it greatly.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
For broadband applications they are usualy fractals. There are ltos of ways to generate fractals.
I think most applications are designed by picking some fractal parameters and then making a real or computer simulated antenna, testing it and then adjusting the paramters.
I don't know you can calculate what fractal is best from first principles.
 
The principles describing the behavior of electromagnetic waves are the Maxwell's equations; that's where we start. More complicated solutions can be approximated by sophisticated software simulations.

A quad band cellular antenna for instance is designed to be sensitive to bands of interest, like 1.8 and 1.9 GHz, and some bands in 800 MHz range. The design could have two antennas duplexed together where one is sensitive to the higher frequencies, and one to lower frequencies. There is no need to pick up anything in between.
 
Last edited:
There are some very nice design programs for antennas.

One that offers a fully working free demo version is EZNEC
http://www.eznec.com/demoinfo.htm

You enter dimensions for wires in a coordinate form that let's you set the spacing between wires as well. Wires can be any diameter so they can be pipes or solid rods or actually thin wires.
A wire is regarded as a number of smaller chunks called segments and you specify how many of these there are in a wire. You get greater accuracy of predicted effects if you have more segments.

This demo limits you to 20 segments but the commercial version allows hundreds of segments.
This is ample for simple antennas.
Sample antenna designs are included.

Other programs ask for a frequency and then just present you with the dimensions for building the antenna.
Building the antenna nearly always involves a bit of adjustment of the computer generated dimensions, but they are a good guide as a start.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top