Designing Tuner: LRC Circuit w/377Ω Impedance @1MHz

  • Thread starter Thread starter gfd43tg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Designing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on designing a tuner circuit with a specified impedance of 377 Ω at 1 MHz and a bandwidth of 2%. Participants clarify that bandwidth should be expressed in frequency units rather than as a percentage, leading to confusion about calculations. The relationship between resistance, inductance, and bandwidth is explored, with emphasis on the need to use angular frequency for accurate results. There is also a question regarding the necessity of a variable inductor in the design. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly interpreting bandwidth and its implications for component values in the LRC circuit.
gfd43tg
Gold Member
Messages
947
Reaction score
48

Homework Statement


Using the circuit layout shown in Fig. 9-15 (Standard LRC circuit), design a tuner that uses a variable inductor, a capacitor, and a resistor. The input impedance of the tuner should be 377 Ω at 1 MHz an its bandwidth should be 2%.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


For this problem, I am assuming that a bandwidth of 2% means that B = .02. For an RLC circuit in series, B = R/L. Since the impedance is purely real at 1 MHz, and I know that 1 MHz is the resonant frequency, and I set it equal to 1/√LC. I choose R = 377 Ω, and the calculations that follow suit produce an inductor and capacitor value that doesn't sound right, the inductor is way too big and the capacitor is way too small. What is going on here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's a table showing the circuit and equations

ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1398755357.667059.jpg



And here is my attempt
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/69202
 

Attachments

  • 11.2 attempt 1.jpg
    11.2 attempt 1.jpg
    33.2 KB · Views: 461
Bandwidth has units of frequency, not a unitless value (like a percentage).

So, what might a 2% bandwidth imply for a frequency of 1MHz?
 
Thanks, how does this look? Still quite a small capacitor, but at least I know what letter to put in front of the F for this order of magnitude ;)


Assuming that this answer is correct, what was the point in specifying that the inductor was variable?

Edit: is Bandwidth the frequency or the angular frequency? Either B= .02*ω0, or B = .02*f?
 

Attachments

  • 11.2 attempt 2.jpg
    11.2 attempt 2.jpg
    27.2 KB · Views: 475
Last edited:
Okay, looking better. But the bandwidth B = R/L yields a value in radians per second, not Hz. You want to work with values of ω.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Ok great, thank you! I changed it to omega, but the exact same procedure.
 
Thread 'Have I solved this structural engineering equation correctly?'
Hi all, I have a structural engineering book from 1979. I am trying to follow it as best as I can. I have come to a formula that calculates the rotations in radians at the rigid joint that requires an iterative procedure. This equation comes in the form of: $$ x_i = \frac {Q_ih_i + Q_{i+1}h_{i+1}}{4K} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i-1} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i+1} $$ Where: ## Q ## is the horizontal storey shear ## h ## is the storey height ## K = (6G_i + C_i + C_{i+1}) ## ## G = \frac {I_g}{h} ## ## C...

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Back
Top