How Is Destructive Interference Achieved with Ionospheric Reflections?

AI Thread Summary
Destructive interference occurs when two waves are out of phase, causing them to cancel each other out. In this case, a radio wave travels directly to a receiver and also reflects off the ionosphere, creating a path difference. The minimum height of the ionospheric layer needed for destructive interference is calculated using the formula for path difference, resulting in a height of 3346.1 meters. This height ensures that the reflected wave is 180 degrees out of phase with the direct wave. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding wave behavior and interference in radio transmission.
Xamfy19
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Here is the problem:

The waves froma radio station can reach a home reciever by two paths. One is a straightline path from transmitter to home, a distance of 19900 m. THe second path is by reflection from the ionoshpere.
Assume: this reflection takes place at a point midway between reciever and transmitter. No phase changes on reflection. If the wavelength brodcast by the radio station is 464 m, find the minimum height h of the ionoshperic layer that produces destructive interference between the direct and the reflected beams.

I cannot figure out how to solve this problem. Where do I start? Could someone please help me?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I got the answer. thank you for trying. the answer is 1.5237 km
 


Destructive interference occurs when two waves with the same frequency and amplitude are out of phase and cancel each other out. In this problem, we have two waves - one traveling directly from the transmitter to the receiver, and one reflected from the ionosphere. We need to find the minimum height of the ionospheric layer that will cause these waves to be out of phase and cancel each other out, resulting in destructive interference.

To solve this problem, we can use the formula for path difference in destructive interference:

Δx = (m + 1/2)λ

Where Δx is the path difference, m is an integer representing the number of half-wavelengths, and λ is the wavelength of the wave.

In this case, the path difference is equal to the difference in distance between the two paths - the direct path and the reflected path. We know that the direct path is 19900 m and the reflected path is half of that, or 9950 m. So the path difference is 9950 m.

We also know that the wavelength of the radio wave is 464 m. Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

9950 m = (m + 1/2) * 464 m

Solving for m, we get m = 21.4. This means that the reflected wave will have traveled 21.4 half-wavelengths more than the direct wave. Since we assume no phase changes on reflection, this means that the reflected wave will be 180 degrees out of phase with the direct wave.

Now, we can use the formula for the height of the ionospheric layer:

h = (λ/4) * √(2m + 1)

Plugging in our values for λ and m, we get:

h = (464 m/4) * √(2*21.4 + 1) = 3346.1 m

Therefore, the minimum height of the ionospheric layer that will cause destructive interference between the direct and reflected waves is 3346.1 m.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top