Detect Ammonia: Cost-Efficient, Accurate Detection

  • Thread starter Thread starter cstoos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ammonia
AI Thread Summary
A cost-efficient and accurate method for detecting ammonia in gaseous mixtures involves using Draeger tubes, which react with ammonia to produce a visible white smoke of ammonium chloride when mixed with HCl fumes. While these tubes are a viable solution, they can be expensive for home use, with a pump costing around $600 and test tubes priced at $70 each. The discussion highlights a need for affordable alternatives, particularly for home mechanics seeking to assess the efficiency of urea injectors in vehicles, as current troubleshooting tools priced at $650 are deemed too costly for casual use.
cstoos
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
What is a cost efficient, yet accurate way to detect ammonia in a gaseous mixture?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Ammonia fumes react with HCl fumes and make a white smoke of ammonium chloride. Accuracy depends of the mixture, I guess.
 
Those Draeger tubes look like a viable solution, though it is a bit pricey for home use. The pump looks to be $600 for the cheapest version then $70 per test for the tubes.

The reason I am asking is I am wondering, with the application of selective catalysts to vehicles throughout Europe and the US, if there is a cheap way for the home mechanic to determine the efficiency of the urea injectors. $650 for a troubleshooting tool is too much for that purpose.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
16K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
14K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top