Detecting WIMPs with superconductors?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jcap
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Superconductors Wimps
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the potential for detecting weakly-interacting massive particles (WIMPs) using superconductors, specifically considering whether interactions with electrons in superconductors could lead to observable effects such as increased electrical resistance. The scope includes theoretical implications, experimental detection methods, and the feasibility of using superconducting materials in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that interactions between WIMPs and electrons in a classical superconductor could disrupt Cooper pairs, potentially leading to increased electrical resistance and thus serving as a detection method for dark matter.
  • Another participant challenges the premise by stating that dark matter particles have not been observed to interact directly, suggesting that a superconductor would need to be extraordinarily large to detect such rare interactions.
  • A third participant questions the assumption that WIMPs can interact with electrons, arguing that if they could, we would have already detected them without the need for superconductors, implying that the use of superconductors does not enhance detection capabilities.
  • One participant acknowledges that while WIMPs interacting weakly with electrons is not impossible, such interactions would be exceedingly rare, and alternative detection methods might be more effective due to expected large momentum transfer.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility and effectiveness of using superconductors to detect WIMPs, with no consensus reached on the validity of the proposed detection method or the assumptions underlying it.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights uncertainties regarding the nature of WIMP interactions, the scale required for detection, and the assumptions about superconductors' roles in such experiments. There are unresolved questions about the conditions necessary for detection and the implications of weak interactions.

jcap
Messages
166
Reaction score
12
If a weakly-interacting massive particle interacted with an electron in a classical superconductor would it break up a "cooper pair" and thus lead to extra electrical resistance?

If so perhaps the loss of superconductivity in a 2-d array of superconducting wires could be used to detect the flux of dark-matter WIMPs across the array? As the 2-d array of wires rotates with the Earth through the WIMPS one might detect a daily fluctuation in the conductivity of the wires.

PS Maybe the wires have to be very close to their "transition" temperature for such a detector to work?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is in the phrase
jcap said:
weakly-interacting massive particle interacted
Dark matter particles have not been observed to directly interact with anything and this is the whole problem with detecting it. If dark matter is there and is indeed very weakly interacting, your setup may need a superconducter the size of an ocean to detect a single particle.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: stoomart
jcap said:
If a weakly-interacting massive particle interacted with an electron in a classical superconductor would it break up a "cooper pair" and thus lead to extra electrical resistance?

This is a huge, and unverified assumption.

If a WIMP can interact with an electron, then we would have seen it EASILY by now. We won't need a superconductor. Having a superconductor here adds nothing to the ability to detect such a thing.

Zz.
 
WIMPs interacting weakly with electrons are not impossible - but the interaction has to be very rare. We would expect large momentum transfer, and there we have better detection methods.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
12K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
751
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
8K