Deteriorating Orbits of Satellites and Objects

  • Thread starter Thread starter TSjames
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbits Satellites
AI Thread Summary
Objects in orbit without propulsion will generally maintain their orbital inclination due to inertia, despite losing speed and altitude over time. The decay of an orbit primarily results from atmospheric drag, which significantly affects only low-altitude satellites. External forces, such as Earth's oblateness and radiation pressure from the Sun, can cause minor precession of the orbital plane. Long-term effects, like the transfer of energy to the Moon, can lead to gradual changes in orbits. Overall, unattended objects do not inherently tend toward the poles or equator but are influenced by specific external factors.
TSjames
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Assuming that an object in orbit has no means of propulsion (dead satellites, NEOs, etc.) and it remains aloft long enough, will it tend to specific areas of orbit or inclination? Do these unnatended objects tend to the poles? to the equator? etc. (I understand that it can be dependent on synchronicity, altitude, etc, but just in general).

Thank you for your help.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It takes energy to change an orbit once it is established. When the orbit decays, the object loses speed and altitude. Unless there is some external force applied, the orbital inclination should stay the same due to inertia.
 
Various forces make the plane of the orbit precess (rotate) - the oblateness of the Earth, for instance. There are also forces such as radiation pressure from the Sun, but the effects are minor. The only thing which really causes an orbit to decay is the drag of the atmosphere, and that only to very low-altitude satellites. Long term, there is the famous transfer of energy to the Moon which is causing its orbit to slowly drift outward.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top