Determinant problem, matrices wee

mr_coffee
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
1
Determinant problem, matrices! wee!

Hello everyone...
I got part a, and b, and I'm stuck on c...
Suppose that a 4 x 4 matrix A with rows v_1, v_2, v_3, and v_4 has determinant det A = -6. Find the following determinants determinants:

det[v_1 v_2 v_3 v_4 + 7*v_2]^T = ?
I made it Transposed so its more readable...really it is just
determinant of
v_1
v_2
v_3
v_4 + 7*v_2

I tried 7*-6 = -42 which was wrong, because if u multiply a column by a constant, it just mutlipies the matrix by that constant, but i don't know what happens if u multip[ly a constant to a a row, and then add it to another row..
Any ideas?
If ur confused on what I'm talking about, here is an answer to part a:
5*v_1
v_2
v_3
v_4

det of that matrix is: 5*-6 = -30;

and part b:
v_4
v_3
v_2
v_1
det of that matrix is 6, because if u swap rows, it will change the sign of the detemrinant.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use the (multi)linearity of the determinant:

\left| {\begin{array}{*{20}c}<br /> {a_{11} } &amp; {a_{12} } \\<br /> {\alpha a_{21} + \beta a_{21} ^\prime } &amp; {\alpha a_{22} + \beta a_{22} ^\prime } \\<br /> \end{array}} \right| = \alpha \left| {\begin{array}{*{20}c}<br /> {a_{11} } &amp; {a_{12} } \\<br /> {a_{21} } &amp; {a_{22} } \\<br /> \end{array}} \right| + \beta \left| {\begin{array}{*{20}c}<br /> {a_{11} } &amp; {a_{12} } \\<br /> {a_{21} ^\prime } &amp; {a_{22} ^\prime } \\<br /> \end{array}} \right|

By the way, for b: mind that every single row-swap changes the sign, so an even number of swaps...
 
thank u TD! but when u said for part b...if its a even number of swaps, wouldn't the determinatant not be changedf at all? it would go from -6 to 6 to -6 to 6, oh wait yah it would thanks!
 
mr_coffee said:
thank u TD! but when u said for part b...if its a even number of swaps, wouldn't the determinatant not be changedf at all? it would go from -6 to 6 to -6 to 6, oh wait yah it would thanks!
Indeed :wink:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top