Determination of time-dependent coefficients (QM)

Aeon
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am trying to solve the following equation:

\Psi(r,t) = \sum_n C_n(t) e^{-i E_n t} \psi(r)

to find the C_n(t)s.

The system I am modeling is benzene. I can, by Hückel's method, determine the time-independent solution. The apparently obvious transition from time-independent coefficients to time-dependent coefficients is troubling me. A simple plot of the squared coefficients indicates that my electron density vanishes, which is indicative of error.

I'm wondering how is the proper way to solve for the time-dependent coefficients...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you leave off a subscript? If you meant to write ψ(r,t) = ∑ Cn(t) exp(-iEnt) ψn(r) where the ψn(r)'s are orthonormal, then
∫ψ(r,t) ψn(r) dr = Cn(t) exp(-iEnt), which gives you Cn.
 
I forgot a subscript, you are right.

Also, the problem was that my vectors were not orthogonalized. Thanks!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Back
Top