Determine a subset for the function of X -> P(X)

  • Thread starter Thread starter hocuspocus102
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the subset Yf from the function f defined as f(x) = X \ {x}, where X is a non-empty set. Participants clarify that Yf consists of elements x in X such that x is not in f(x). Through examples with the set X = {1, 2, 3}, it is established that Yf includes all elements of X since no element x is present in its corresponding f(x). The conclusion reached is that Yf equals X for any non-empty set, confirming that Yf is simply the entirety of X. The conversation emphasizes understanding the definitions and relationships between the elements and their images under the function f.
hocuspocus102
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose X is a non-empty set and f:X->power set of X (ie P(X)) is defined f(x) = X/x. Consider the subset Yf = {x in X such that x not in f(x)} of X. Determine Yf for the particular f we have just described.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Any suggestions would be helpful because I really don't know where to start on this problem...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This really isn't a profound question. It looks like it's just testing if you can read the notation. Pick X={1,2,3}. What's f(1)?
 
f(1) in that case would be {2,3} right? but how does that translate to Yf?
 
hocuspocus102 said:
f(1) in that case would be {2,3} right? but how does that translate to Yf?

Right. Is 1 in Y_f?
 
no, so is Yf just X/x ?
 
hocuspocus102 said:
no, so is Yf just X/x ?

Read the definition of Y_f again. Aloud. I don't want to know what Y_f is yet, I just want to know if 1 is in it. No is the wrong answer. Why?
 
no 1 isn't in it because it's x in X such that x not in f(x) and 1 is not in f(1)
 
hocuspocus102 said:
no 1 isn't in it because it's x in X such that x not in f(x) and 1 is not in f(1)

If 1 is not in f(1), doesn't that mean 1 IS in Y_f?
 
I get that for f(1), 2 is in Y_f and 3 is in Y_f but 1 is not.
for f(2), 1 is in Y_f and 3 is in Y_f but 2 is not.
so for f(n) on a set of size t Y_f will have all numbers in the set 1 through t not including n in it. is that how you'd say that or is there a more explicit formula?
 
  • #10
hocuspocus102 said:
I get that for f(1), 2 is in Y_f and 3 is in Y_f but 1 is not.
for f(2), 1 is in Y_f and 3 is in Y_f but 2 is not.
so for f(n) on a set of size t Y_f will have all numbers in the set 1 through t not including n in it. is that how you'd say that or is there a more explicit formula?

Ach. I think you are getting this wrong. 1 ISN'T in f(1). Doesn't that tell you 1 IS in Y_f? Or did you state the question wrong?
 
Last edited:
  • #11
I don't know I thought f just took n to a set with all elements of X not including n because Y_f is x not in f(x)
 
  • #12
hocuspocus102 said:
I don't know I thought f just took n to a set with all elements of X not including n because Y_f is x not in f(x)

That's really confusing. Let's go back. If X={1,2,3} is 1 in Y_f? I don't think we really ever got that one right.
 
  • #13
no it's not
 
  • #14
hocuspocus102 said:
no it's not

Yes, it is. Yf = {x in X such that x not in f(x)}. 1 is in X but it's NOT in f(1)={2,3}. So 1 IS in Y_f.
 
  • #15
ohhhh. ok so Y_f is whatever value you plug in for x?
 
  • #16
hocuspocus102 said:
ohhhh. ok so Y_f is whatever value you plug in for x?

Hmm. What Y_f is actually doesn't depend on what x is. x is what's called a dummy variable. Work it out for X={1,2,3} and tell me what members of X are in Y_f.
 
  • #17
{1,2,3} are in Y_f because f(1) implies 1 is in it, f(2) implies 2 is in it and f(3) implies 3 is in it right?
 
  • #18
hocuspocus102 said:
{1,2,3} are in Y_f because f(1) implies 1 is in it, f(2) implies 2 is in it and f(3) implies 3 is in it right?

Right. So Y_f=X={1,2,3}. Does the same thing work for every set?
 
  • #19
it should
 
  • #20
hocuspocus102 said:
it should

It does. x is never in X/{x}.
 
  • #21
so Y_f is just X?
 
  • #22
hocuspocus102 said:
so Y_f is just X?

What do YOU think? That's a lot more important than what I think.
 
  • #23
that's what I think
 
  • #24
hocuspocus102 said:
that's what I think

I agree.
 
  • #25
ok. Thank you very much!
 
Back
Top