Determine speed of car from result of impact?

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the speed of a car from an impact is complex and not very accurate without professional tools. The discussion highlights that while basic physics principles like velocity, friction, and mass can be considered, idealized setups may not yield reliable results. The individual involved in the accident is curious about the speed due to airbag deployment, suspecting it was over 25 mph. However, participants advise against DIY accident reconstruction and recommend consulting a specialist for accurate analysis. Ultimately, understanding the specifics of the collision requires professional expertise.
doggonemess
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
Greetings,

It's been quite a while since I had to do anything with velocity, friction, mass, and practically any physics over simple calculations. My car was hit yesterday while parked. There were no injuries, and it still drives just fine. The collision was hard enough to deploy the other car's airbag.

I don't need to know the answer for legal reasons, it's all being taken care of by insurance. But out of curiosity, is there a way to calculate the velocity of the car from the data that I have?

I can tell from how offset my car is from straight how much it moved. I know the masses of both vehicles, as well as the road surface where my car was sitting for the friction of the tires.

Can someone noodle this one out? I'd love to know.

Jamie
 
Physics news on Phys.org
doggonemess said:
is there a way to calculate the velocity of the car from the data that I have?
No. Accident reconstruction is a very tricky business. Of course you can do some idealised setup where you can input what you know, but it will not be very accurate.
 
Orodruin said:
No. Accident reconstruction is a very tricky business. Of course you can do some idealised setup where you can input what you know, but it will not be very accurate.

I'm happy with making some assumptions and getting a ballpark figure. I suspect they were going faster than 25 mph due to the airbag deployment. I'm wondering if they were going much faster than that.
 
doggonemess said:
Greetings,

It's been quite a while since I had to do anything with velocity, friction, mass, and practically any physics over simple calculations. My car was hit yesterday while parked. There were no injuries, and it still drives just fine. The collision was hard enough to deploy the other car's airbag.

I don't need to know the answer for legal reasons, it's all being taken care of by insurance. But out of curiosity, is there a way to calculate the velocity of the car from the data that I have?

I can tell from how offset my car is from straight how much it moved. I know the masses of both vehicles, as well as the road surface where my car was sitting for the friction of the tires.

Can someone noodle this one out? I'd love to know.

Jamie
As already pointed out, we do not help with accident analysis and reconstruction here. Please consider hiring a specialist to help you with this.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

Three Car Collision - Can physics help clarify twin impact?
Replies
3
Views
16K
Solving Car Collision: Velocity Impact of 40cm Rear End Impact
Replies
17
Views
2K
Car Accident Analysis: Speed at Impact and Vehicle Specifications Revealed
Replies
4
Views
2K
Is a car's top speed the same on a wet road?
Replies
26
Views
6K
Determine speed needed to cause rollover of car hitting ramp
Replies
4
Views
2K
Can an object maintain uniform motion without any external force?
2
Replies
66
Views
5K
Can anyone estimate the speed of a vehicle in a car accident without skid marks?
Replies
4
Views
3K
How to calculate each car tyre load during cornering?
Replies
10
Views
5K
Velocity of Head from Car Accident
Replies
2
Views
4K
B Understanding Momentum: The Relationship Between Mass, Velocity, and Force
Replies
29
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top