Determine the Magnitude of the instantaneous Velocity

AI Thread Summary
To determine the magnitude of instantaneous velocity at T=5s for the function x=AT^2 + B, where A=2.1 m/s² and B=2.8 m, one must understand the relationship between position and velocity, which is derived from calculus. Instantaneous velocity is found by taking the derivative of the position function with respect to time. The average velocity and displacement values provided indicate that the user is struggling with the fundamental concepts of calculus. It is suggested that the user review basic calculus principles to better grasp these concepts. Understanding these foundational ideas is crucial for solving similar problems in the future.
Chris Carney
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine the Magnitude of the instantaneous velocity at T=5s
Function is x=AT^2 + B
A=2.1m/s^2
B=2.8 M

Homework Equations


The previous questions answered on this problem are:
AVG Velocity is 16.8
Displacement is 33.6 from 3s to 5s

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure how to find either magnitude or instantaneous velocity. I need it broken down to the most basic steps to understand.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you understand what the relationship is between position and velocity? Have you taken calculus?
 
I took calc and calc 2 about 4 years ago, I passed with A's but left school on military orders and have just gotten back into school. I forgot a lot of what I learned then.
 
so, do you understand what the relationship is between position and velocity?
 
phinds said:
so, do you understand what the relationship is between position and velocity?
No, no I do not.
 
Chris Carney said:
No, no I do not.

Well, do you think maybe my repeatedly asking you about it is a hint to look it up?

I'm not trying to give you a hard time here, but part of what we do is try to help people learn how to get answers on their own, not spoon-feed answers. The relationship between position and velocity is extremely basic and one of the things that is generally brought up early in calculus so you really should study it a bit if you want to understand this kind of problem.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top