Determine the maximum ratio h/b

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sanchayan Dutta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maximum Ratio
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the maximum ratio h/b for a block sliding on an incline without toppling under force F, considering static friction with coefficient μs. Participants debate the appropriate point for applying rotational equilibrium, questioning whether it should be about the center of mass or the vertex opposite to the force application. The consensus suggests that rotational equilibrium should theoretically yield consistent results regardless of the chosen point, provided all forces are accurately accounted for. However, discrepancies in results indicate potential errors in calculations. Clarification is sought on the specific attempts made to resolve these issues.
Sanchayan Dutta
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Determine the maximum ratio $$h/b$$ for which the homogenous block will slide without toppling under the action of force F.The coefficient of static friction between the block and the incline is $$\mu_s$$.
l5RXv.png

I have a doubt.About which point should the rotational equilibrium be applied?Should it be applied about centre of mass?Or should it be applied about the vertex opposite to the vertex where F is applied?Why?

**MY ATTEMPT:**

**Translational Equations**
$$F+mg\sin(\theta) \geq \mu N$$
and $$N=mgcos(\theta)$$

**Rotational Equations**
This is where I'm facing a problem.Depending upon which point the equilibrium is applied the required ratio will be obtained.

**MY VIEWS:**

Rotational equilibrium should hold at all points if no toppling/rotation happens.However the answer varies depending on the point of application of equilibrium.Strange.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sanchayan Dutta said:
However the answer varies depending on the point of application of equilibrium.Strange.
You are right that it would be strange. As long as you take all relevant forces into account properly, you should get the same answer. You must be making a mistake in one or other of your attempts.
Please post those attempts.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top