Determine whether or not is a Hermitian operator

AI Thread Summary
The operator F, defined as Fψ(x) = ψ(x+a) + ψ(x-a), is analyzed for Hermitian properties. It is established that F is bounded, allowing for the existence of its adjoint. The key step involves verifying the Hermiticity condition in integral form, specifically checking if ∫ dx ψ*(x) Fψ(x) equals ∫ dx Fψ*(x). The discussion concludes that F satisfies the Hermitian condition, confirming that F is indeed a Hermitian operator.
dje
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The operator F is defined by Fψ(x)=ψ(x+a) + ψ(x-a), where a is a nonzero constant. Determine whether or not F is a Hermitian operator.


Homework Equations



∫(x+a)d/dx + (x-a)d/dxψ



The Attempt at a Solution



f = (1=ax) + (1-ax)ψ

What are the steps I need to do to figure this out. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No matter the value of a, one can show that F is bounded, so the adjoint of it exists. Then all you need is to check is the hermiticity condition in integral form:

\int dx \psi^{*}(x) F\psi(x) = ?

Try to get the psi with exchanged argument under the complex conjugate sign.
 
I am not sure of these steps but I will try. Can you show me if I am still not understanding this. thanks.

Fψ(x)=Fψ(x+a) + ψ(x-a) Fτ= F to be Hermitian
Fψ (x+a) + (x-a) = F dt/dx? (x+a) + (x-a)

= F dt/dx (x + a) + (x-a)

∫(x+a)d/dx + (x-a)d/dx ψ



F τ= (1+ax)ψ + (1-ax)ψ



KEY= * below/symbol I am wanting here is circle with vertical line through it.
(θ*/ψ) = (ψ/θ*)
θ* (x) ψ(x+a) + ψ(x-a) dt/dx dx
= ψ(x +a) + ψ (x-a) dθ*/dx dx

Solution- F is Hermitian operator Fτ= F
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top