Determining acid/base properties

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathewsMD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Properties
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on comparing the basicity of NH3 and HOCOO-. It explores the stability of their conjugate acids, NH4+ and HOCOOH, questioning whether the uncharged nature of NH3 makes it a better base than HOCOO-. Participants highlight the importance of factors like electronegativity, atomic size, and resonance in determining stability, while also acknowledging that experimental testing is crucial for definitive conclusions. There is confusion about the stability of charged versus uncharged species and the role of solvent interactions in influencing basicity. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the complexity of acid-base properties and the need for a comprehensive analytical framework.
MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
How can you tell NH3 is a better base than HOCOO-?

I look at the conjugate species in both to determine their relative stabilities. Where NH4+ is the conjugate acid of ammonia and HOCOOH the conjugate acid for acetate. In this case, isn't the NH3 more stable than NH4+ since it is uncharged yet still has a full octet on the N? Also, wouldn't the HOCOOH be more stable than HOCOO- since it's not charged and thus doesn't even have any charge to spread. Therefore, using this reasoning of the actual charges, should HOCOO- be the better base since its conjugate acid is more stable (lower in energy; it is weaker than NH4+)?

I'm sure there are other properties like the electronegativity of the atom bearing the charge, atomic size, electron withdrawing atoms in the compounds and net charge, but how do you determine the priority when comparing compounds like this? Are there any other properties I'm missing?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
MathewsMD said:
How can you tell NH3 is a better base than HOCOO-?

I look at the conjugate species in both to determine their relative stabilities. Where NH4+ is the conjugate acid of ammonia and HOCOOH the conjugate acid for acetate. In this case, isn't the NH3 more stable than NH4+ since it is uncharged yet still has a full octet on the N? Also, wouldn't the HOCOOH be more stable than HOCOO- since it's not charged and thus doesn't even have any charge to spread. Therefore, using this reasoning of the actual charges, should HOCOO- be the better base since its conjugate acid is more stable (lower in energy; it is weaker than NH4+)?

I'm sure there are other properties like the electronegativity of the atom bearing the charge, atomic size, electron withdrawing atoms in the compounds and net charge, but how do you determine the priority when comparing compounds like this? Are there any other properties I'm missing?

HOCOOH is carbonic acid not acetic so you need to clarify what you are talking about.
 
MathewsMD said:
How can you tell NH3 is a better base than HOCOO-?

The only sure way is to test it experimentally.
 
Borek said:
The only sure way is to test it experimentally.

Okay. Is there a framework for analyzing properties of the molecules to at least make an educated guess before experiment? I tried to look at electronegativity, atomic size, resonance and inductive effect but may be looking past something.

I try to rationalize that -COOH is more stable than NH4+ since it is uncharged and has full octets while the other has a charge, but this doesn't coincide with experimental results. I just don't quite seem to comprehend exactly why resonance would be more stable in this case, since -COO- has a charge and I realize resonance is more stable than a localized charged, but isn't no charge for -COOH even more stable? I'm sure the solvent (water in this case) has a major role and possibly induces a strong electrostatic attraction with the partial negative oxygens, but even still, those waters are not directly bonded and thus have more unstable bonding with the negative oxygens than a strongly covalently bonded hydrogen.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top