Determining Analytic Orientation from Angular Velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the analytic orientation of a torque-free, axisymmetric body given its angular velocity. The angular velocity is defined as a function of time with specific constants, and the goal is to derive an analytic representation of the body's orientation from an initial state. While numerical methods like quaternions and rotation matrices are known, the challenge lies in finding an analytic approach. Clarification is sought on what is meant by "orientation," emphasizing that it typically refers to the direction of angular velocity. The conversation suggests that understanding the geometric shape of the body is crucial for analyzing its rotational behavior.
dgreenheck
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I am doing an analysis concerning the torque-free motion of an axisymmetric body (J1 = J2 != J3).

The angular velocity is given

\omega(t) = [\omega_t\ sin(\Omega t), \omega_t\ cos(\Omega t), \omega_{z0}]

where \omega_t, \Omega and \omega_{z0} are constants. I would like to determine the orientation of the body at any time t given an initial orientation at t = 0. My end goal is to have an analytic representation of the orientation that I can use as "truth" to compare the errors of various numerical methods of estimating the orientation.

I know how to find numerical solutions to this problem using quaternions/direction cosine matrices/rotation vectors, etc., but am not sure how to approach this from an analytic point of view.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dgreenheck said:
I am doing an analysis concerning the torque-free motion of an axisymmetric body (J1 = J2 != J3).

The angular velocity is given

\omega(t) = [\omega_t\ sin(\Omega t), \omega_t\ cos(\Omega t), \omega_{z0}]

where \omega_t, \Omega and \omega_{z0} are constants. I would like to determine the orientation of the body at any time t given an initial orientation at t = 0. My end goal is to have an analytic representation of the orientation that I can use as "truth" to compare the errors of various numerical methods of estimating the orientation.

I know how to find numerical solutions to this problem using quaternions/direction cosine matrices/rotation vectors, etc., but am not sure how to approach this from an analytic point of view.
Unless I have not understood your question, it looks to me that you already have the answer. Since the constants are given, you already know the direction of the angular velocity as a function of time.
 
Chandra Prayaga said:
Unless I have not understood your question, it looks to me that you already have the answer. Since the constants are given, you already know the direction of the angular velocity as a function of time.
Yes, but what is the orientation of the spinning body
 
When you use the word orientation, you have to specify what you mean. Usually, orientation means that there is some vector property of the body, which is pointing in some direction. In the case of a spinning body, the angular velocity (or angular momentum) is that vector. The direction of the angular velocity IS the orientation of the body. What you are probably looking for is to specify the geometric shape of the body, such as a cube, and then you can ask a question like, how the edges of the cube are rotating as the object rotates about some axis. The axis in this case, is again, the direction of the angular velocity
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top