Determining Eigenfunction of Operator

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
15 replies · 3K views
Hart
Messages
168
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Determing the constant c such that [tex]\psi_{c}(x,y,z) = x^{2}+cy^{2}[/tex] is an eigenfunction of [tex]\hat{L_{z}}[/tex]

Homework Equations



[tex]\hat{L_{z}} = -i \hbar (x\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial y} - y\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]x\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial y} - y\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}) = 2x^{2}-2y^{2}c[/tex]

Therefore:

[tex]\hat{L_{z}} \psi = -i \hbar (2x^{2}-2y^{2}c) = -2i \hbar (x^{2}-y^{2}c)[/tex]

.. and now I'm stuck. :|
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hart said:

Homework Statement



Determing the constant c such that [tex]\psi_{c}(x,y,z) = x^{2}+cy^{2}[/tex] is an eigenfunction of [tex]\hat{L_{z}}[/tex]

Homework Equations



[tex]\hat{L_{z}} = -i \hbar (x\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial y} - y\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x})[/tex]

You need to pay more attention to your notation. You can either say,

[tex]\hat{L_{z}}\psi(x,y,z)= -i \hbar \left(x\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial y} - y\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\right)[/tex]

or

[tex]\hat{L_{z}} \longrightarrow -i \hbar \left(x\frac{\partial}{\partial y} - y\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\right)[/tex]

But you can't equate an abstract differential operator to a scalar function like you did above

[tex]x\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial y} - y\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x} = 2x^{2}-2y^{2}c[/tex]

You need to double check this. :wink:
 
I was meant to state this:

[tex]\hat{L_{z}}\psi(x,y,z)= -i \hbar \left(x\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial y} - y\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\right)= -i \hbar (2x^{2}-2y^{2}c) = -2i \hbar (x^{2}-y^{2}c)[/tex]

[/tex]

I don't know how to rearrange that the find the value of C.
 
Hart said:
I was meant to state this:

[tex]\hat{L_{z}}\psi(x,y,z)= -i \hbar \left(x\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial y} - y\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\right)= -i \hbar (2x^{2}-2y^{2}c) = -2i \hbar (x^{2}-y^{2}c)[/tex]

I don't know how to rearrange that the find the value of C.

[tex]\left(x\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial y} - y\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\right)\neq (2x^{2}-2y^{2}c)[/tex]

Recheck your calculation.
 
I have:

[tex] <br /> (x\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial y}) = x(2cy) = 2cxy<br /> [/tex]

and:

[tex] <br /> (y\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}) = y(2x + c) = 2cxy<br /> [/tex]

so:

[tex] <br /> \hat{L_{z}}\psi(x,y,z)<br /> <br /> = -i \hbar \left(x\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial y} - y\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\right)<br /> <br /> = -i \hbar (2cxy - 2cxy)<br /> <br /> = 0<br /> [/tex]

?
 
Hart said:
[tex] <br /> (y\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}) = y(2x + c) = 2cxy<br /> [/tex]

Where's the [itex]c[/itex] in this part coming from?

[tex]\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x}=\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left(x^2+cy^2\right)=2x[/itex][/tex]
 
It should be:

[tex](y\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}) = y(2x + 0) = 2xy[/tex]

then.

Ok, so:

[tex]\hat{L_{z}}\psi(x,y,z)= -i \hbar \left(x\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial y} - y\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\right)= -i \hbar (2cxy - 2xy)= -2i \hbar xy(c-1)[/tex] ??
 
Hart said:
Ok, so:

[tex]\hat{L_{z}}\psi(x,y,z)= -i \hbar \left(x\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial y} - y\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\right)= -i \hbar (2cxy - 2xy)= -2i \hbar xy(c-1)[/tex] ??

Yup, so if [itex]\psi[/itex] is an eigenfunction of [tex]\hat{L}_z[/itex], what equation must be true?[/tex]
 
[tex]\lambda = \frac{-2i \hbar xy(c-1)}{x^{2}+cy^{2}}?[/tex]
 
Hart said:
[tex]\lambda = \frac{-2i \hbar xy(c-1)}{x^{2}+cy^{2}}?[/tex]

Sure, but I'd write this as

[tex]\lambda\left(x^2+cy^2\right)=-2i \hbar xy(c-1)[/itex]<br /> <br /> At first, it may not look like there are any values of [itex]c[/itex] that will make this true for all [itex]x[/itex] and [itex]y[/itex], but what if [itex]\lambda=0[/itex]?[/tex]
 
[tex]\lambda\left(\psi_{c}\right)=-2i \hbar xy(c-1)[/tex]

It would be true if [tex]\lambda = 0[/tex]?
 
Hart said:
[tex]\lambda\left(\psi_{c}\right)=-2i \hbar xy(c-1)[/tex]

It would be true if [tex]\lambda = 0[/tex]?

You tell me...if [itex]\lambda=0[/itex] what does that equation become? Are there any values of [itex]c[/itex] that make that equation true?
 
[tex]\lambda\left(\psi_{c}\right)=-2i \hbar x y (c-1) = -2i \hbar x y c + 2i \hbar x y[/tex]

[tex]0 = -2i \hbar x y c + 2i \hbar x y[/tex]

[tex]2i \hbar x y c = 2i \hbar x y[/tex]

[tex]c = 1<br /> [/tex]
 
Right, so for c=1, [itex]\psi[/itex] is an eigenfunction of [itex]\hat{L}_z[/itex] with corresponding eigenvalue [itex]\lambda=0[/itex].

If [itex]\lambda\neq 0[/itex] are there any values of [itex]c[/itex] which satisfy the eigenvalue equation for all [itex]x[/itex] and [itex]y[/itex]?
 
Um.. c can be any integer value? it's just a scaling value.
 
Hart said:
Um.. c can be any integer value? it's just a scaling value.

So, you are telling me that [itex]\lambda\left(x^2+cy^2\right)=-2i \hbar xy(c-1)[/itex] is satisfied for any integer value of [itex]c[/itex]?