Determining Energy Values for a One-Dimension Spin Chain

  • Thread starter Thread starter PenKnight
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvalues Spin
PenKnight
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Same problem as this old post
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=188714


What I'm having problems with is determining the H_{ij} components of the Hamiltonian of a one dimension N site spin chain. And then getting out somehow energy value to prove

<br /> \lim_{n-&gt;\inf}\frac{E_{0}}{N} = \ln{2}+ \frac{1}{4}<br />

Homework Equations



The hamitonian of the spin chain

<br /> \sum^{k=0}_{N-1}[H_{z}(k)+H_{f}(k)]<br />

where

<br /> H_{z}(k)=S^{z}(k)S^{z}(k+1)<br />

<br /> H_{f}(k)=\frac{1}{2}[S^{+}(k)S^{-}(k+1)+S^{-}(k)S^{+}(k+1)]<br />

The above can be gain from determing Sx and Sy from the rasing and lowering operators.

The Attempt at a Solution



I can see that at any site location within a state ,( a state is some configuration of site which hold either +- 1/2), the hamilotinan will pull out these eigenvalues.

<br /> H|...\uparrow\uparrow... \rangle = S^{z}(k)S^{z}(k+1)|...\uparrow\uparrow... \rangle<br />

<br /> = S^{z}(k)\frac{1}{2}|...\uparrow\uparrow ...\rangle =\frac{1}{4}|...\uparrow\uparrow ...\rangle<br />

And for the other possible combinations

<br /> H|...\uparrow\downarrow... \rangle = -\frac{1}{4}|...\uparrow\downarrow ...\rangle + \frac{1}{2}|...\downarrow\uparrow... \rangle<br />

<br /> H|...\downarrow\uparrow ...\rangle = -\frac{1}{4}|...\downarrow\uparrow... \rangle + \frac{1}{2}|...\uparrow\downarrow... \rangle<br />

<br /> H|...\downarrow\downarrow...\rangle = \frac{1}{4}|...\downarrow\downarrow...\rangle<br />

But then finding the energy values ( taking the &lt;\phi | H|\phi &gt; )
will lead all states to having the same energy which is not correct. So either I've missed somthing or computing the H matrix incorrectly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PenKnight said:
The hamitonian of the spin chain

<br /> \sum^{k=0}_{N-1}[H_{z}(k)+H_{f}(k)]<br />

Surely you mean:

H= \sum_{k=1}^{N}[H_{z}(k)+H_{f}(k)]

Right?
I can see that at any site location within a state ,( a state is some configuration of site which hold either +- 1/2), the hamilotinan will pull out these eigenvalues.

<br /> H|...\uparrow\uparrow... \rangle = S^{z}(k)S^{z}(k+1)|...\uparrow\uparrow... \rangle<br />...

This makes no sense to me...All N particles can each be in the up or down state, and the Hamiltonian acts on all N particles... you can't just pick out two particles in a chain and calculate the effect of H that way...You can however, say H(k)|...\uparrow\uparrow... \rangle = \frac{1}{4}|...\uparrow\uparrow... \rangle and so on, for H(k)=H_z(k)+H_f(k)
 
Last edited:
Yep your right.

I was trying to show what the spin operators pulls out for a particular pairing but mucked up in notation. I think going through a couple of examples may get my head around this.

Here the first one with N = 3 and considering periodic boundary condition.

<br /> H|\uparrow\downarrow\uparrow\rangle =<br /> H_z|\uparrow\downarrow\uparrow\rangle +<br /> H_f|\uparrow\downarrow\uparrow\rangle<br />

<br /> =<br /> (-\frac{1}{4} -\frac{1}{4}+ \frac{1}{4} )|\uparrow\downarrow\uparrow\rangle +<br /> \frac{1}{2} ( |\downarrow\uparrow\uparrow\rangle +|\uparrow\uparrow\downarrow\rangle)<br />

I'm not actually sure how to get the energy value with the H_f terms eigenstates. Do i just add up all the co-efficient?

Edit
I think I've got it now. I'll be back if I can't get the eigenvalues from the Hamiltonian.
 
Last edited:
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top